public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vipin Kumar <vipin.kumar@st.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] usbh/ehci: Increase timeout for enumeration
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:30:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C871CF.3050207@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C86D40.4010906@compulab.co.il>

On 12/12/2012 5:10 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 12/12/12 11:54, Vipin Kumar wrote:
>>
>>>> +        ulong start = get_timer(0);
>>>> +
>>>> +        do {
>>>> +            ret = usb_get_port_status(dev, i + 1, portsts);
>>>> +            if (ret<   0) {
>>>> +                USB_HUB_PRINTF("get_port_status failed\n");
>>>> +                break;
>>>> +            }
>>>> +
>>>> +            portstatus = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortStatus);
>>>> +            portchange = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortChange);
>>>> +
>>>> +            if ((portchange&   USB_PORT_STAT_C_CONNECTION) ==
>>>> +                (portstatus&   USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION))
>>>
>>> I don't know if there is any corner case when the above check
>>> will always fail and so it will always wait a maximal delay time.
>>> Are those registers that identical, or can there be differences?
>>>
>>>> +                break;
>>>> +
>>>> +            mdelay(100);
>>>> +        } while (get_timer(start)<   CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 10);
>>>
>>> Is there any justification for the CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 10?
>>> I would be much more fine with this patch if there were any
>>> (even just test based * 2) reason for that number.
>>>
>>
>> Not really. Just a practical test.
>
> Ok. good. can we please have a comment saying that this value
> is based on observations? Thanks!
> You can add my ack along with the comment in v3.
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>

Thanks Igor
Marek, I am waiting for your comments now, if any

-Vipin

      reply	other threads:[~2012-12-12 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-07  8:58 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] usbh/ehci: Increase timeout for enumeration Vipin Kumar
2012-12-07 10:03 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-07 10:18   ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-07 10:32     ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12  9:54   ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12 11:25     ` Marek Vasut
2012-12-13  6:11       ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12 11:40     ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-12 12:00       ` Vipin Kumar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C871CF.3050207@st.com \
    --to=vipin.kumar@st.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox