public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vipin Kumar <vipin.kumar@st.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] usbh/ehci: Increase timeout for enumeration
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:41:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C9719E.9050001@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201212121225.11667.marex@denx.de>

On 12/12/2012 4:55 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Vipin Kumar,
>
>>>> +		ulong start = get_timer(0);
>>>> +
>>>> +		do {
>>>> +			ret = usb_get_port_status(dev, i + 1, portsts);
>>>> +			if (ret<   0) {
>>>> +				USB_HUB_PRINTF("get_port_status failed\n");
>>>> +				break;
>>>> +			}
>>>> +
>>>> +			portstatus = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortStatus);
>>>> +			portchange = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortChange);
>>>> +
>>>> +			if ((portchange&   USB_PORT_STAT_C_CONNECTION) ==
>>>> +				(portstatus&   USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION))
>>>
>>> I don't know if there is any corner case when the above check
>>> will always fail and so it will always wait a maximal delay time.
>>> Are those registers that identical, or can there be differences?
>>>
>>>> +				break;
>>>> +
>>>> +			mdelay(100);
>>>> +		} while (get_timer(start)<   CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 10);
>>>
>>> Is there any justification for the CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 10?
>>> I would be much more fine with this patch if there were any
>>> (even just test based * 2) reason for that number.
>>
>> Not really. Just a practical test.
>> Marek, can I have comments from you as well
>>
>
> Sorry, I'm really busy these days. I went through it and I see Igor still has
> some comment. Just fix that one and I'm good.
>

Thanks marek, I would send a v3 soon

> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut
> .
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-13  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-07  8:58 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] usbh/ehci: Increase timeout for enumeration Vipin Kumar
2012-12-07 10:03 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-07 10:18   ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-07 10:32     ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12  9:54   ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12 11:25     ` Marek Vasut
2012-12-13  6:11       ` Vipin Kumar [this message]
2012-12-12 11:40     ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-12 12:00       ` Vipin Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C9719E.9050001@st.com \
    --to=vipin.kumar@st.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox