[U-Boot] [PATCH RESEND 2/4] video: Fix compilation dependency of exynos_dp and exynos_mipi on exynos_fb

[Donghwa Lee <dh09.lee@samsung.com>]

On 2012? 12? 15? 14:25, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Ajay,
>
> On 13/12/12 20:29, Ajay Kumar wrote:
>> When only DP is used, we need not enable CONFIG_EXYNOS_MIPI_DSIM.
>> Similarly, when only MIPI is used, we need not enable CONFIG_EXYNOS_DP.
>> But the current structuring of code forces us to enable both
>> CONFIG_EXYNOS_MIPI_DSIM and CONFIG_EXYNOS_DP.
>> This patch adds conditional compilation check to remove the dependency.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com>
>> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/video/exynos_fb.c |    4 ++++
>>   1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/exynos_fb.c b/drivers/video/exynos_fb.c
>> index d9a3f9a..39d3b74 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/exynos_fb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/exynos_fb.c
>> @@ -103,8 +103,10 @@ static void lcd_panel_on(vidinfo_t *vid)
>>   
>>   	udelay(vid->power_on_delay);
>>   
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EXYNOS_DP
>>   	if (vid->dp_enabled)
>>   		exynos_init_dp();
>> +#endif
> Unnecessary.
> please see arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/dp_info.h
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_EXYNOS_DP
> unsigned int exynos_init_dp(void);
> #else
> unsigned int exynos_init_dp(void)
> {
> 	return 0;
> }
> #endif
>
>>   
>>   	if (vid->reset_lcd) {
>>   		vid->reset_lcd();
>> @@ -120,8 +122,10 @@ static void lcd_panel_on(vidinfo_t *vid)
>>   	if (vid->enable_ldo)
>>   		vid->enable_ldo(1);
>>   
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EXYNOS_MIPI_DSIM
>>   	if (vid->mipi_enabled)
>>   		exynos_mipi_dsi_init();
>> +#endif
> This should be modified like exynos_init_dp?
>
> Donghwa, how you think?

I agree with you. It looks better than using #ifdef.

Thank you,
Donghwa Lee