public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] i.MX6 Solo and Dual Lite
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:33:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F72AC1.5080105@boundarydevices.com> (raw)

Hi all,

We're preparing to launch i.MX6 Solo/Dual-Lite and Dual versions of
our Nitrogen6X product line.

We made a couple of stabs at patches to support these processor
variants in September and October last year.

The first attempt added run-time detection using i.MX plugins:
     http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/#134442

It was soundly rejected.

The second attempt added preprocessor support to imximage in order
to allow a single board definition file to be compiled for each
processor variant.
     http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/#134442

We think the approach was generally agreed to based on this comment
from Tom:
     http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-October/137611.html

And a follow-up patch from Troy:
     http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-October/138162.html

But things seemed to stall here:
     http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-November/139918.html

Troy submitted a number of other patches, including some fixes to the
DDR initialization, but they were all made based on a 'preprocessorized'
version of mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg.

Troy and I also had some discussion surrounding **how** the preprocessor
was used to define the differences between processors:
     http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-October/136751.html

In a nutshell, the current patch set uses a set of preprocessor macros
to configure things for each. For example, this macro call in the file
mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg will write either 0x48254A36 (Quad or Dual)
or 0x3F3F3035 (Dual-Lite/Solo) to register MMDC_P1_MPWRDLCTL:

     WRITE_ENTRY2(MMDC_P1_MPWRDLCTL, 0x48254A36, 0x3F3F3035)

Nobody else seemed to comment on this, and it seems pretty critical.

Can we get some feedback before we prepare V2/V3 patches?

Our expectation is that we'll submit patches for each of the
following configurations of Nitrogen6X:

     nitrogen6q		- Dual/Quad 1GB
     nitrogen6q2g	- Dual/Quad 2GB
     nitrogen6solo	- Solo 512MB
     nitrogen6duallite	- Dual Lite 512MB
     nitrogen6solo1G	- Solo 1GB
     nitrogen6duallite1G	- Dual Lite 1GB

Our hope is that we can do this with essentially one code
base but a separate .cfg file or #ifdefs for each.

A single include/config/nitrogen6x.h with #ifdefs should
allow us to exclude those features (e.g. SATA) on the
Solo and Dual-Lite.

Please advise,


Eric

             reply	other threads:[~2013-01-16 22:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-16 22:33 Eric Nelson [this message]
2013-01-18 13:55 ` [U-Boot] i.MX6 Solo and Dual Lite Stefano Babic
2013-01-19 19:09   ` Eric Nelson
2013-01-21  9:12     ` Stefano Babic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50F72AC1.5080105@boundarydevices.com \
    --to=eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox