From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Holger Brunck Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:35:08 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/15] updates for km83xx boards In-Reply-To: References: <1358426881-24117-1-git-send-email-holger.brunck@keymile.com> Message-ID: <50F80C1C.7010105@keymile.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi, On 01/17/2013 03:30 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot- >> bounces at lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Holger Brunck >> Sent: 17 January 2013 18:18 >> To: u-boot at lists.denx.de >> Cc: Kim Phillips; Holger Brunck >> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/15] updates for km83xx boards >> >> Hi Kim, >> here are some updates for our km83xx board support and some patches >> for our >> common code. In generic u-boot code there is only one small change in >> the driver >> for kmeter1_nand which is currently only used from our boards. If I >> should >> seperate this one from this serie then let me know. > > Dear Holger > > If those patched are not for mainlining purpose then should be labelled as RFC or some similar? > why do you think that they are not meant to be send for mainline inclusion? Of course they are send to get into mainline. Regards Holger