From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikita Kiryanov Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:04:55 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 5/7] cm-t35: add support for dvi displays In-Reply-To: <20130129140013.3496E2A08AC@gemini.denx.de> References: <1359463349-11649-1-git-send-email-nikita@compulab.co.il> <1359463349-11649-6-git-send-email-nikita@compulab.co.il> <20130129140013.3496E2A08AC@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <5107E517.20106@compulab.co.il> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Wolfgang Denk, On 01/29/2013 04:00 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Nikita Kiryanov, > > In message <1359463349-11649-6-git-send-email-nikita@compulab.co.il> you wrote: >> Add support for dvi displays with user selectable dvi presets. > ... >> --- a/board/cm_t35/cm_t35.c >> +++ b/board/cm_t35/cm_t35.c >> @@ -216,6 +216,9 @@ static void cm_t3x_set_common_muxconf(void) >> /* SB-T35 Ethernet */ >> MUX_VAL(CP(GPMC_NCS4), (IEN | PTU | EN | M0)); /*GPMC_nCS4*/ >> >> + /* DVI enable */ >> + MUX_VAL(CP(GPMC_NCS3), (IDIS | PTU | DIS | M4));/*GPMC_nCS3*/ > > Is it intentional and correct to always enable DVI, even when this is > not configured by the user? This simply prepares the mux that makes it possible to enable DVI. The actual enabling of DVI is indeed conditional on user setup. > > >> +/* >> + * The frame buffer is allocated before we have the chance to parse user input. > > This seems broken to me. Agreed. > > Please explain why you think so? This isn't just my impression. A patch was submitted by Stephen Warren to address this issue (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212378/), but it isn't in mainline yet. > >> + * vl_{col | row} to the maximal resolution supported by OMAP3. >> + */ >> +vidinfo_t panel_info = { >> + .vl_col = 1400, >> + .vl_row = 1050, >> + .vl_bpix = LCD_BPP, >> + .cmap = (ushort *)0x80100000, > > Can we please avoid such hard coded magic numbers? OK. > > >> +/* >> + * env_parse_displaytype() - parse display type. >> + * >> + * Parses the environment variable "displaytype", which contains the >> + * name of the display type or preset, in which case it applies its >> + * configurations. > > So we have yet another custom implementation for setting the display > type? Can we please agree on using common standard methods? thanks. Most of what is custom in this patchset is parsing of environment variables. For actually setting up the DSS I do use common code (specifically omap3_dss_panel_config() and related structs/defines). > > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > -- Regards, Nikita.