From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:51:38 -0700
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Tegra: MMC: Add DT support to MMC
 driverforall T20 boards
In-Reply-To: <CA+m5__Lj8jNQ9jrJYgxDebYL9A48UXwRiFopqcfAXdku4rY1ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1360021735-13286-1-git-send-email-twarren@nvidia.com>
	<1840400.szc2ZZKqeu@fb07-iapwap2>
	<CA+m5__LpxTTjjS2gBmOMhT11XLwt449hBm7M18hznbiB1OkNWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1745057.lvCEnp1xgN@ax5200p>
	<CA+m5__Lj8jNQ9jrJYgxDebYL9A48UXwRiFopqcfAXdku4rY1ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <511170DA.3060400@wwwdotorg.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 02/05/2013 01:41 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
...
> I left the Paz00 tegra_mmc_init(3) call the same as originally (w/o
> the width and GPIO params, of course). The device numbering is kind of
> arbitrary - if there are only 2 MMC devices present, I'd expect dev 0
> to be eMMC and dev 1 to be SD (again, like my T20 reference board,
> Seaboard).  I don't see that Paz uses mmc anywhere in its config files
> for a boot script - does it have to have mmc dev 3 be SD? or would dev
> 1 work? Note that the tegra20-common-post.h file that all T20 boards
> inherit uses dev 0 and dev 1.

This board currently uses U-Boot MMC device ID 0 for the eMMC and U-Boot
MMC device ID 1 for the SD card slot. The U-Boot device ID's aren't
directly related to the Tegra HW instance IDs.