From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:17:50 -0700
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] Tegra: fdt: Add/enhance sdhci (mmc)
 nodes for all T20 DT files
In-Reply-To: <CA+m5__JQxLoQAmvJEzNYXzONYhNTmcdsDHvSCh8LM44ymD8wZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1360603051-29478-1-git-send-email-twarren@nvidia.com>
	<1360603051-29478-2-git-send-email-twarren@nvidia.com>
	<1360603706.1537.2.camel@tellur>
	<CA+m5__JK6oD=Dm_ZSM74-fQVwPYOPTLfwYZMM9fQimRApDwF3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130211191107.GB25894@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
	<CA+m5__JQxLoQAmvJEzNYXzONYhNTmcdsDHvSCh8LM44ymD8wZw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <511AA36E.2060409@wwwdotorg.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 02/11/2013 12:21 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
...
> So the options seem to be:
> 
> a) Don't use the tamonton dtsi file, and put the sdhci nodes in the AD
> dts files, just like all other boards (this was my V1 approach).
> Vetoed by Stephen.
> b) Use tegra20-tamonten.dtsi as is, identical to the kernel file. If
> necessary, I can move it's inclusion to a separate patch, independent
> of the MMC DT patchset, as suggested by Lucas.

That option looks fine to me. The initial check-in of the .dts file
should definitely be a separate patch.

Does U-boot actually work correctly if you give it the kernel DT? There
are quite a few quirks that U-Boot relies on IIRC...