public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs: mmc: spi: dma: Better wrap the MXS differences
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 12:50:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5128ACFA.5000608@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359784533-20614-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>

On 02/02/2013 06:55, Marek Vasut wrote:
> This patch streamlines the differences between the MX23 and MX28 by
> implementing a few helper functions to handle different DMA channel
> mapping, different clock domain for SSP block and fixes a few minor
> bugs.
> 
> First of all, the DMA channel mapping is now fixed in dma.h by defining
> the actual channel map for both MX23 and MX28. Thus, MX23 now does no
> longer use MX28 channel map which was wrong. Also, there is a fix for
> MX28 DMA channel map, where the last four channels were incorrect.
> 
> Next, because correct DMA channel map is in place, the mxs_dma_init_channel()
> call now bases the channel ID starting from SSP port #0. This removes the
> need for DMA channel offset being added and cleans up the code. For the
> same reason, the SSP0 offset can now be used in mxs_dma_desc_append(), thus
> no need to adjust dma channel number in the driver either.
> 
> Lastly, the SSP clock ID is now retrieved by calling mxs_ssp_clock_by_bus()
> which handles the fact that MX23 has shared SSP clock for both ports, while
> MX28 has per-port SSP clock.
> 
> Finally, the mxs_ssp_bus_id_valid() pulls out two implementations of the
> same functionality from MMC and SPI driver into common code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mxs/dma.h      |   19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mxs/regs-ssp.h |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/mmc/mxsmmc.c                     |   20 ++++----------------
>  drivers/spi/mxs_spi.c                    |    4 ++--
>  4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> NOTE: COMPILE TESTED ONLY!!! I need someone to actually test this stuff.

Hi all,

I am thinking about how to proceed with this. Is there any plan to test
it ? It would prefer that it runs at least once else merging it now
without any test and fix later.

Regards,
Stefano

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-23 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-02  5:55 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs: mmc: spi: dma: Better wrap the MXS differences Marek Vasut
2013-02-23 11:50 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2013-02-23 12:18   ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5128ACFA.5000608@denx.de \
    --to=sbabic@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox