[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Introduced btrfs file-system with btrload command

[Adnan Ali <adnan.ali@codethink.co.uk>]

On 25/02/13 16:29, Tom Rini wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/25/2013 11:08 AM, Adnan Ali wrote:
>> On 25/02/13 15:04, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:24:37PM +0000, Adnan Ali wrote:
>>>
>>>> Introduces btrfs file-system to read file from
>>>> volume/sub-volumes with btrload command. This implementation
>>>> has read-only support. This btrfs implementation is based on
>>>> syslinux btrfs code, commit
>>>> 269ebc845ebc8b46ef4b0be7fa0005c7fdb95b8d.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Adnan Ali <adnan.ali@codethink.co.uk>
>>> A few things: - In general in fs/btrfs/btrfs.c I see some coding
>>> style problems (lack of spacing, non-printf's longer than
>>> 80-wide).  Do these come from syslinux and thus will make any
>>> re-syncs easier?
>> Most of the ported code is unmodified so its coding style should be
>> same as syslinux.
> That's what I thought.
>
>>> - It looks like you added support for CONFIG_CMD_FS_GENERIC, if
>>> so did you test that?
>> This command wasn't enabled in my configs. I haven't added any
>> command i.e btrls for this as this feature is not supported yet.
> Can you then please?  Thanks.
       I have added support for this in my configs, build and flashed
on my mx53loco hardware it booted fine. When i type LS gives me
** Unrecognized filesystem type **. which is what i have done it in
code. Any ls should print above message when its using btrfs.
>
>>> - Can you please enable this support code on at least one
>>> platform, preferably the one you've tested and developed with?
>> Even if do enable support for this, it will also debug 'Unsupported
>> filesystem type.'
> I don't understand.
     I'm assuming that you are asking me to test it on atleast one
hardware platform with CONFIG_CMD_FS_GENERIC enabled. Which
i done it on mx53loco. If my assumption is wrong can you please
rephrase your question.

>
>> For the rest of changes you proposed i will change them and send as
>> v4 patch.
> Thanks!
>
> - -- 
> Tom
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRK5FtAAoJENk4IS6UOR1WLbYP/i/c8s10TIoya1UnLiCX87tt
> u/DRhip4/HBhyCtZmxCejLM6VrgJ8GBACq7hP6eXY3BE5zRB11rKnaypOdc1EA6h
> WG87W+6LDOQEvFPzuyXRpXIGvUwq5gHsa95rM0pq/k5WnUJwl4eRAyuhU0JFilQ8
> p83GUbYH3Ss1ZX6sr2O+LNkGrIW/PNw1TVioJYyfUUQvcqVYw8CIBLSusxCkY445
> ps2QD3Np4XvYXkGFoHUkb0t+Lp0m87PaHBAuABr+TqUEne+QT3GU1E6xN4jcoasX
> 2Bd0LQFnIhoU6hiH/EuAsQs8tt48ByEliug0Yvr7iK4Cb5sQen21LjXUagarvArF
> RKkg/SThdqwYStfkX5/+z73m2F3lcGGF9IobVuz9HWi2VvXEYM500+pGYcOzjP+3
> V+deSp0PReW4lbFRnFgxcArETIumd4+deCQzX9XHUC20iC/Xf2N+s6L5VTGqQf0g
> 33+QDPaUo1SdCZmKiCpVuBa0hzZsQPRhFOHRUpGbEZRbf45iHl5Ewhm88K6dTiz4
> vsr7YJDs4rJcph0q6tKSLVVGioPpa3EqpWZrXGB4JTwc6GHbluAvL7GXrHWxtbtX
> AZOxNEegmljq+l+6g+n2sZ+RDlyynU/x9NvKVEM8ucqmMGrcrTKG5fUc536U2sWL
> 8xEfGHfYMZ9AxbF0DEXY
> =FPEv
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thanks

Adnan