From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:48:54 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Introduced btrfs file-system with btrload command In-Reply-To: <512B94EA.7000104@codethink.co.uk> References: <1361795077-3674-1-git-send-email-adnan.ali@codethink.co.uk> <1361795077-3674-2-git-send-email-adnan.ali@codethink.co.uk> <20130225150438.GA11611@bill-the-cat> <512B8C75.5040101@codethink.co.uk> <512B916E.7000208@ti.com> <512B94EA.7000104@codethink.co.uk> Message-ID: <512B95F6.2030505@ti.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/25/2013 11:44 AM, Adnan Ali wrote: > On 25/02/13 16:29, Tom Rini wrote: [snip] >>>>> - It looks like you added support for >>>>> CONFIG_CMD_FS_GENERIC, if so did you test that? >>>> This command wasn't enabled in my configs. I haven't added >>>> any command i.e btrls for this as this feature is not >>>> supported yet. > Can you then please? Thanks. >> I have added support for this in my configs, build and flashed on >> my mx53loco hardware it booted fine. When i type LS gives me ** >> Unrecognized filesystem type **. which is what i have done it in >> code. Any ls should print above message when its using btrfs. > >>>>> - Can you please enable this support code on at least one >>>>> platform, preferably the one you've tested and developed >>>>> with? >>>> Even if do enable support for this, it will also debug >>>> 'Unsupported filesystem type.' > I don't understand. >> I'm assuming that you are asking me to test it on atleast one >> hardware platform with CONFIG_CMD_FS_GENERIC enabled. Which i >> done it on mx53loco. If my assumption is wrong can you please >> rephrase your question. OK. Can you please add btrfs support to CONFIG_CMD_FS_GENERIC? Or try and point out that it's quite difficult / annoying / we need to fix our interface? You'd be the first person other than the author of the original changes to do so, so your feedback here would be quite useful. Thanks! - -- Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRK5X2AAoJENk4IS6UOR1WFqAP/0DStonfADUwZTzyxwT22spZ xGrJGUCVBBpiZ+xoO3ZRuKYG/DAkD3kYATV2DqgM/kqVuusHyiPeh4z1qcO78tWk Quwce9sIU5uhMkQey0sCbIX5YHgxY0DbrcxpNLedQLKLo1NOZY3/uJUDRNt8uIeP B3PH5uNXR8hVwwC0ML8dC8ZK7/XbPBZvdr0jjhYR8RzfHVxbpFKNL1vjxsN9TZiS ZAp+DyIP389FPRQd2zt4bhzNHGuJ2TkwewEXi00MCO8vKkRKvuPZbV7hc0w9t+d7 m1VbAzLL/FZ9ld8r3CvowgBg91vP/y8Vjr5bnX9CaZzaf96vPTVldx/UmZ9xtWtb TzPxPaYkHXEmtdGfxfYI/v1CHu9rkjiDOrZMPbXNx2XzjYdwp5kk8Hlfqi+F8d+m wFt+q2kHZdAEPDoIcvsi4buAbiqyehH03K0QpaH1UaEH01lVvw8S9U1p9/iLcSrV c1kN4GMySKdPTIoTv97S4SpHUcijI1aMOaqc462M4YKroRg54iMMHCFkQBy0HF4U n6B+yZv1Yy5IWf4Z5b143V8FN8yOSvfzG+gEMICc/NZU09nT6fwfPRfMWj2lIPj8 wsDYpdL7amDAl2TUCLEB8vbue5ELjB2Bu2S25wKrsKrN9mPvh1LvFyHhO4HJ49Ly +1SAb04CSBOhgXOzO+SZ =pYZr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----