public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common: imx: Implement generic u-boot.nand target
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:21:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <512F8423.7010708@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515227433.195653.1362067619200.JavaMail.root@advansee.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/28/2013 11:06 AM, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:24:22 PM, Beno?t Th?baudeau 
> wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>> 
>> On Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:03:09 PM, Tom Rini write:
>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:18:48PM +0100, Beno??t Th??baudeau 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Marek,
>>>> 
>>>> On Monday, February 25, 2013 7:19:54 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>> Implement u-boot.nand target that can be reused with a 
>>>>> small amount of churn across all CPU models. The idea is
>>>>> to delegate the u-boot.nand target out of the main
>>>>> Makefile and into the CPU's Makefile (very similar to what
>>>>>  u-boot.imx does now). The main Makefile shall only
>>>>> contain path to which the u-boot.nand target is delegated. 
>>>>> Hopefully this will not produce too much bloat in the main 
>>>>> Makefile.
>>>>> 
>>>>> To demonstrate this implementation, add u-boot.nand target 
>>>>> for i.MX53.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> Cc: Beno??t 
>>>>> Th??baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> Cc: Fabio 
>>>>> Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> Cc: Stefano Babic 
>>>>> <sbabic@denx.de> --- Makefile                     |   18 
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile |    6 
>>>>> ++++++ 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>> 
>>>>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 41054b7..8b1010a 
>>>>> 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -470,6 +470,23 @@ 
>>>>> $(obj)u-boot.img:	$(obj)u-boot.bin $(obj)u-boot.imx: 
>>>>> $(obj)u-boot.bin depend $(MAKE) -C 
>>>>> $(SRCTREE)/arch/arm/imx-common $(obj)u-boot.imx
>>>>> 
>>>>> +# +# Generic u-boot.nand target. +# +# Every CPU that 
>>>>> needs u-boot.nand must add a path to an implementation of 
>>>>> +# the actual u-boot.nand generator below. +# +ifdef 
>>>>> CONFIG_MX53 +CONFIG_NAND_TRG_PATH := 
>>>>> $(SRCTREE)/arch/arm/imx-common +endif +
>>>>> +$(obj)u-boot.nand: $(obj)u-boot.bin depend +		if [
>>>>> "X$(CONFIG_NAND_TRG_PATH)X" = "XX" ] ; then		\ +			echo
>>>>> "This CPU does not support u-boot.nand target!" ;	\ +
>>>>> exit 1 ;						\ +		fi + $(MAKE) -C $(CONFIG_NAND_TRG_PATH)
>>>>> $(obj)u-boot.nand + $(obj)u-boot.kwb:
>>>>> $(obj)u-boot.bin $(obj)tools/mkimage -n
>>>>> $(CONFIG_SYS_KWD_CONFIG) -T kwbimage \ -a
>>>>> $(CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE) -e $(CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE) -d $< $@
>>>>> @@ -857,6 +874,7 @@ clobber:	tidy @rm -f $(obj)u-boot.kwb
>>>>> @rm -f $(obj)u-boot.pbl @rm -f $(obj)u-boot.imx +	@rm -f
>>>>> $(obj)u-boot.nand @rm -f $(obj)u-boot.ubl @rm -f
>>>>> $(obj)u-boot.ais @rm -f $(obj)u-boot.dtb diff --git
>>>>> a/arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile 
>>>>> b/arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile index 5d5c5b2..71ea36f 
>>>>> 100644 --- a/arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile +++ 
>>>>> b/arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile @@ -50,6 +50,12 @@ 
>>>>> $(obj)u-boot.imx: $(OBJTREE)/u-boot.bin 
>>>>> $(OBJTREE)/$(patsubst "%",%,$(CONFIG_IMX 
>>>>> $(OBJTREE)/tools/mkimage -n $(filter-out %.bin,$^) -T 
>>>>> imximage \ -e $(CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE) -d $< $@
>>>>> 
>>>>> +$(obj)u-boot.nand: $(obj)u-boot.imx +	(								\ +		echo 
>>>>> -ne '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x46\x43\x42\x20\x01' ;	\
>>>> ^ It does not work in my environment (Ubuntu 12.10). -ne is 
>>>> interpreted as text, so the FCB is broken. This is because 
>>>> /bin/sh (set to dash) is invoked by default on my machine 
>>>> here. It would work with the /bin/bash set by the main 
>>>> Makefile for SHELL, but this is not passed to the sub-make.
>>>> 
>>>> So what do you think we should do: 1) Add "export SHELL" to 
>>>> the main Makefile? 2) Move the SHELL assignment from the
>>>> main Makefile to the top-level config.mk? 3) Set
>>>> "SHELL=$(SHELL)" on the command line when invoking the
>>>> sub-make? 4) Use printf instead of echo? 5) Something else?
>>>> 
>>>> I like 1). Do you see possible side effects?
>>> 
>>> Wait!  We do 1 already and have for years (cf7a7b99), so
>>> what's going on?
>> 
>> Indeed! But I get anyway SHELL set to /bin/bash in /Makefile,
>> and to /bin/sh in /arch/arm/imx-common/makefile.
>> 
>> I don't see SHELL being set anywhere else, and $(MAKE) 
>> SHELL=$(SHELL) works.
>> 
>> That's really weird. It's like SHELL export was ignored, or 
>> applied before the assignment. I will further dig into this.
> 
> From "5.3.2 Choosing the Shell" in the make manual, it seems 
> impossible to force make to use SHELL from the environment, even 
> with export. The note about SHELL in "5.7.2 Communicating
> Variables to a Sub-make" can be misleading however.
> 
> Without "export SHELL", the recipes are executed with the set 
> SHELL, but the default value of SHELL is in their environment.
> 
> With "export SHELL", the recipes are executed with the set SHELL, 
> which is also in their environment. But since the sub-make ignores 
> its environment for SHELL, it does not help. That's probably why 
> Linux uses CONFIG_SHELL (which means nothing special to make) 
> instead of SHELL.
> 
> So 1) is not a solution, and 4) also does not work. So we are left 
> with 2), 3) or 5).

How about 3?

- -- 
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=qSEN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-28 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-25 18:19 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common: imx: Implement generic u-boot.nand target Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 18:19 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] imx: Align the imximage header and payload to multiples of 4k Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 19:13   ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-25 21:07     ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 21:16       ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-25 18:19 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx5: Add NAND clock handling Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 19:27   ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-25 18:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] mx5: Add support for DENX M53EVK Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 19:33   ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-26 13:52   ` Fabio Estevam
2013-02-26 19:32   ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-14 17:20     ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-14 19:07       ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-14 19:18         ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 18:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common: imx: Implement generic u-boot.nand target Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-25 21:09   ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 21:13     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-26  1:02   ` [U-Boot] patch error wanxs
2013-02-25 20:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common: imx: Implement generic u-boot.nand target Scott Wood
2013-02-25 21:10   ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 22:15     ` Scott Wood
2013-02-25 23:03       ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 23:07         ` Scott Wood
2013-02-25 23:50           ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-26  7:19             ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-26 11:33               ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-27 17:33                 ` Tom Rini
2013-02-28 18:50                   ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-28 18:53                     ` Tom Rini
2013-02-26  7:17           ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-26 23:10             ` Scott Wood
2013-02-27 22:18 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-27 23:44   ` Tom Rini
2013-02-27 23:47     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-28 12:18       ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-28 14:03   ` Tom Rini
2013-02-28 15:24     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-28 16:06       ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-28 16:21         ` Tom Rini [this message]
2013-02-28 16:29           ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-28 16:42             ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=512F8423.7010708@ti.com \
    --to=trini@ti.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox