From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Minkyu Kang Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:54:06 +0900 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc:sdhci:fix: Change default interrupts enabled at SDHCI initialization In-Reply-To: <20130311092258.7f69e19c@amdc308.digital.local> References: <1357916934-11340-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <20130129154743.6e104850@amdc308.digital.local> <20130211095059.7b70a599@amdc308.digital.local> <20130221182115.6bf338fa@amdc308.digital.local> <51265D33.8030606@ti.com> <5126AECE.2020509@samsung.com> <5126B113.1040406@ti.com> <20130222081101.2eb7fb8c@amdc308.digital.local> <20130311092258.7f69e19c@amdc308.digital.local> Message-ID: <513F094E.4000501@samsung.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Lukasz, On 11/03/13 17:22, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Dear All, > >> Hi Tom, >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 02/21/2013 06:33 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: >>>> Hi Tom, >>>> >>>> On 02/22/2013 02:45 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On 02/21/2013 12:21 PM, >>>> Lukasz Majewski wrote: >>>>>>> Dear All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd like to kindly ask for any feedback on this patch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is now more than month on the u-boot mailing list... >>>> >>>> OK, sorry, the generic name of the driver threw me for a minute. >>>> I'm fine with this change going up u-boot-samsung -> u-boot-arm -> >>>> master since it's a samsung-only driver right now. Does this work >>>> for you? >>>>> I think that this driver didn't use samsung-only. going up >>>>> u-boot-samsung? I'm not sure that. >>> >>> Unless the context got very wrong, it touches drivers/mmc/sdhci.c >>> which is controlled by CONFIG_SDHCI which is only turned on in what >>> look like samsung platforms to me. >>> >> >> There is a /asm/arch-pantheon/config.h file which sets the >> CONFIG_SDHCI flag. It was added by Lei Wen (who is CC'ed to this >> thread) and looks like ARM926EJS (Marwell Semiconductor) processor >> based system. >> >> Other systems are indeed samsung based processors. >> >> I don't mind if this patch would go via u-boot-samsung tree. >> >> Moreover, since this change "touches" Lei system, I think that he >> should have expressed his opinion. Sadly this didn't happened.... > > Any feedback? If not, please pull this patch to u-boot mainline. > > Today it is 2 months since this patch has been posted on ML. No reply > from interested people. > Since Andy seems absent, applied to u-boot-samsung. Thanks, Minkyu Kang.