[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: at91: at91sam9n12ek: add nandflash/spiflash/mmc/lcd support

["Andreas Bießmann" <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>]

Dear Josh Wu,

On 03/18/2013 10:57 AM, Josh Wu wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang Denk
> 
> Thanks for your review.  See my comment below:
> 
> On 3/18/2013 2:58 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Josh Wu,
>>
>> In message <1363342624-2939-1-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com> you
>> wrote:
>>> This patch adds at91sam9n12ek support, it enables:
>>> - dbgu
>>> - nand with pmecc
>>> - spi flash
>>> - mmc
>>> - lcd
>> It appears you are adding support for a new board - in this case the
>> Subject: is misleading, plrase fix.
>>
>> The missing entry in MAINTAINERS has already been pointed out. Please
>> also make sure to run your patch through checkpatch - it complains for
>> example "WARNING: line over 80 characters".  Please fix these, too.
>>
>> Please also make sure to keep all lists sorted. Bo shen already
>> mentioned this for the Makefile, but this also applies to lists as
>> here:
>>
>>      #elif defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9G45) ||
>> defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9M10G45) \
>>     -        || defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9X5)
>>     +        || defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9X5) || defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9N12)
>>
> 
> I'll fix them in next version.

Can we please find another identifier instead? I will not have these
always growing list of SoC defines to distinguish between different
access modes. Can we find some common thing which all these SoC headers
export then? I mean something like 'AT91_CLOCK_IP_V2' in this case here.
If we are looking forward to a single u-boot binary for different boards
I would favor some runtime detection.

Beside that I will do a full review of the patch later this day.

Best regards

Andreas Bie?mann