From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:04:12 +0530
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 0/9] OMAP3-5: TWL[46]03[05]: cleanup
 register access and misc minimal cleanups
In-Reply-To: <20130326132558.GA16539@kahuna>
References: <1363988004-25819-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com>
	<51508DC6.2090304@ti.com>
	<CAGo_u6qWhW37XBCRbUyab1vsdgN2fDdVQ83UOyw08NGemVJCOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<51516AE2.9090605@ti.com> <20130326132558.GA16539@kahuna>
Message-ID: <5151A3D4.3070608@ti.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tuesday 26 March 2013 06:55 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 15:01-20130326, Sricharan R wrote:
>> approach we will end up creating a new tps659038.h which does exactly
>> the same thing. This does not feel correct. Can't we differentiate
>>  using register names that are passed instead ?
> tps659038/twl6035/twl6037 all belong to palmas family of PMICs. So, how about
> renaming the file to palmas.c and use palmas_i2c_read/write functions?
> 
Yes, sounds good.

Regards,
 Sricharan