[U-Boot] [PATCH v11 2/2] Enable btrfs support in mx53loco config

[Adnan Ali <adnan.ali@codethink.co.uk>]

On 02/04/13 18:03, Tom Rini wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/02/2013 11:52 AM, Robert Nelson wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Adnan Ali
>> <adnan.ali@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On 02/04/13 16:19, Robert Nelson wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Adnan Ali
>>>> <adnan.ali@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> Enable btrfs support in mx53loco config
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Adnan Ali <adnan.ali@codethink.co.uk> ---
>>>>> include/configs/mx53loco.h |    4 +++- 1 file changed, 3
>>>>> insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/include/configs/mx53loco.h
>>>>> b/include/configs/mx53loco.h index a4b610f..62e9a76 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/configs/mx53loco.h +++
>>>>> b/include/configs/mx53loco.h @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ #define
>>>>> CONFIG_GENERIC_MMC #define CONFIG_CMD_FAT #define
>>>>> CONFIG_CMD_EXT2 +#define CONFIG_CMD_BTR +#define
>>>>> CONFIG_CMD_FS_GENERIC #define CONFIG_DOS_PARTITION
>>>>>
>>>>> /* Eth Configs */ @@ -128,7 +130,7 @@ "mmcroot=/dev/mmcblk0p3
>>>>> rw rootwait\0" \ "mmcargs=setenv bootargs
>>>>> console=ttymxc0,${baudrate} root=${mmcroot}\0" \
>>>>> "loadbootscript=" \ -               "fatload mmc
>>>>> ${mmcdev}:${mmcpart} ${loadaddr} ${script};\0" \ +
>>>>> "btrload mmc ${mmcdev}:${mmcpart} ${loadaddr} ${script};\0"
>>>>> \
>>>> Instead of changing this to btrload for everyone, wouldn't it
>>>> make more sense to use the generic "load" command? As your
>>>> already setting "CONFIG_CMD_FS_GENERIC"
>>> Well idea of adding that was to enable btrfs and to show its
>>> associated commands. Yes you can use generic 'load' command.
>>> Defaults was using fatload so i change it to btrload.
>> That's perfectly fine for showing the btrfs command's as an RFC
>> patch, but if this was heading for mainline as-is, it would be nice
>> to use the "load" command instead of moving from one partition
>> format that's been default for a couple years to a new format with
>> less users. (not that I don't like the btrfs format. ;) as i've
>> been running it on a few omap boards for a couple years now..)
> Exactly.  The code needs to be built somewhere, to not be considered
> dead code.  The next change here, to loadbootscript needs to be done
> in a forward-compatible way like 'load' so now it just works for
> everyone.  Thanks!
     I will need to send this as separate patch.

[snip]

Thanks
Adnan