From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:44:45 +0530
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 5/5] ARM: OMAP4/5: Make bootz as the default
 boot command
In-Reply-To: <20130405090601.4abbc913@lilith>
References: <515AFA30.6020706@ti.com>
	<1365141274-22459-1-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com>
	<20130405090601.4abbc913@lilith>
Message-ID: <515E79E5.7010307@ti.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Albert,

On Friday 05 April 2013 12:36 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Sricharan,
> 
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:24:34 +0530, Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> So with OMAP added to multi platform kernel,
>> the uImage no more contains a valid load address.
>> With the uboot already supporting zImage,
>> change the default boot command to bootz
>> instead.
>>
>> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
>> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  include/configs/omap4_common.h |    4 ++--
>>  include/configs/omap5_common.h |    4 ++--
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Is there a reason why this patch does not have history?
> 
> Amicalement,
 I had a minor change only in these two from the series.
 So reposted only these two with 'in-reply-to' threads.
 If this is not the right etiquette, then should it be
 update/appended in the original patch ?

Regards,
 Sricharan