From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sricharan R Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 13:58:05 +0530 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 5/5] ARM: OMAP4/5: Make bootz as the default boot command In-Reply-To: <20130405100826.685f4dce@lilith> References: <515AFA30.6020706@ti.com> <1365141274-22459-1-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com> <20130405090601.4abbc913@lilith> <515E79E5.7010307@ti.com> <20130405100826.685f4dce@lilith> Message-ID: <515E8B15.6070601@ti.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Friday 05 April 2013 01:38 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Sricharan, > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:44:45 +0530, Sricharan R > wrote: > >> Hi Albert, >> >> On Friday 05 April 2013 12:36 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Hi Sricharan, >>> >>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:24:34 +0530, Sricharan R >>> wrote: >>> >>>> So with OMAP added to multi platform kernel, >>>> the uImage no more contains a valid load address. >>>> With the uboot already supporting zImage, >>>> change the default boot command to bootz >>>> instead. >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon >>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R >>>> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon >>>> --- >>>> include/configs/omap4_common.h | 4 ++-- >>>> include/configs/omap5_common.h | 4 ++-- >>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> Is there a reason why this patch does not have history? >>> >>> Amicalement, >> I had a minor change only in these two from the series. >> So reposted only these two with 'in-reply-to' threads. >> If this is not the right etiquette, then should it be >> update/appended in the original patch ? > > My question is not about the series but only about 5/5 which has > no patch history after the commit message delimiter (---) whereas 4/5 > has history. > > If 5/5 has a minor change in V4, then it should have a history log > indicating which minor change it was. > ok. 5/5 was just rebase on 4/5. Will add it though. Sorry for the miss. Regards, Sricharan