From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:34:40 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP5: I2C: Enable i2c5 clocks In-Reply-To: <51628F66.7010406@mm-sol.com> References: <515DA1A7.4070007@mm-sol.com> <51625F1B.9050407@ti.com> <51628F66.7010406@mm-sol.com> Message-ID: <5162B960.9090900@ti.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/08/2013 05:35 AM, Lubomir Popov wrote: > One more thing I would like to clarify to myself: in your patch > series of Apr. 1 you rename the omap5_evm to omap5_uevm. On the > other hand, uEVM was the TI-internal name for the PandaBoard5, and > the evm was known as sEVM. Doesn't this cause confusion? After all, > these are two quite different hardware platforms. Moving forward, there is only uEVM and sEVM doesn't exist. - -- Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRYrlgAAoJENk4IS6UOR1WkBoP/iIMkPldiFmQRmDRCiuvoprd 0qq7Cak8Y1XF1YYwGARXW4Hup/Tvz6UpPxJx5oa5ESTIm0Km3CcBHw+0j3OuLYm5 K3XnXQ0Y+WHBf0V5uZJMMN7PqeoIV/R1SaKKp3421jPuaP9suBiihfKGP5Z78jl7 gXM14711xk4UgGitZc4ER73G6mlwOQyFABGONxyoAOhDuVN2BuPcx69OYUINKDrw h9iW6JTtVwe+5JVIMPDYqUZJALgbeKsjMBOHjsFMahHlVGHDJ+SAKZ4IWnfKi8tY J5Wi6PeeSqqokhL+dcMRWDRq5A7ufU9beRkFdmuWJRkFNhc7Jpqd/8kxctGbgf3t NkI7UrbCTilTJnvv9/oEu+MVx6bBOXfD2uOy5m6kaOqZG+XFN1KsGJGs/PsevklL zmwxYfDNSJl0DReMK8Wc7zFKN+vbpRDkcFGkG3yJAfTkWWm+fNfhygM/+aFNvT1K NQivqSf546MbOU4CWWkhaF6pSivObT7br9yHP17QLLJnR2uWINzKu9kk2fcRRltJ Q+jdQ6XLUDJ/7H22GhtrWNvzLCqphi/v7dpEtfF/0/syUnUnOEYOCtvUulRaMyKT bHdaylb1lOJtwaf0iGROR6Jb9DuRUBLoRP+iM7PjPQpqhxrONIs6RWe76/0l5Gaf nnLD8mOPhKBItASlevtK =lm6d -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----