From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Schocher Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:17:02 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, 1/4] cam_enc_4xx: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics In-Reply-To: <20130409144221.20bc6503@lilith> References: <1365451109-22030-2-git-send-email-albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> <20130408204353.GP5729@bill-the-cat> <5163BA32.2020702@denx.de> <20130409110808.166e7413@lilith> <5164057A.4010306@denx.de> <20130409144221.20bc6503@lilith> Message-ID: <516414CE.3060007@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Albert, on 09.04.2013 14:42, wrote Albert ARIBAUD: > Hi Heiko, > > On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:11:38 +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote: > >>> Let us assume I keep 12K. Here is a current build of cam_enc_4xx: >>> >>> text data bss dec hex filename >>> 439526 13148 311092 763766 ba776 ./u-boot >>> 9073 840 500 10413 28ad ./spl/u-boot-spl [...] >>> Would that be ok? >> >> Yes, that seems good to me, but I could not test it ... > > I can do a diff of the binaries with and without the patch -- > normally, they should be the same except for the U-Boot version > identification. Would that do? Yes. I did this too, and see only a diff for the version string. (But not forget to commit your change first, else the "-dirty" in the version string will insert an offset ;-) bye, Heiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany