From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:48:46 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches PLUS 31 patches... In-Reply-To: <270954750.1682096.1365698015119.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> References: <20130411172534.22f389bd@lilith> <20130411183058.11bf0186@lilith> <270954750.1682096.1365698015119.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> Message-ID: <5166E96E.90500@ti.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/11/2013 12:33 PM, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On Thursday, April 11, 2013 6:30:58 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Hi Albert, >> >> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:25:34 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Older toolchain and PPC incompatibilities appeared in the last >>> two additions to ToT ARM. To avoid non-bisectability, ToT has >>> been rolled back from abbecf4c87 to ae74b65987. This removes >>> >>> abbecf4 ARM: Fix __bss_start and __bss_end in linker scripts >>> >>> (HIDDEN not known by most binutils 2.22 or older ones) >>> >>> aad17a2 ARM: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics 72c1601 >>> smdk5250, snow: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics 55e46fc >>> da850evm, da850_am18xxevm: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics >>> 0502854 cam_enc_4xx: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics >>> >>> (PPC builds fail because --pad-to receives an expr, not a >>> constant) >> >> Actually, the failure was not due to this series, but to patch >> 16/30 of Beno?t's series. In agreement with Tom, rolling further >> back, removing the recent TI PR merge and all of Beno?t's >> series. >> >> Beno?t, can you fix 16/30 wrt PPC building? If you provide >> branches, I or Tom can do tests. >> >> Once v12 is ready, I'll apply it back, then the TI PR, then the >> __bss_end patch, then the SPL max size series, this one list in >> order to give us time to choose how overall SPL >> text+data+rodata+BSS size testing should be done. > > OK, I'll do that. I need to know: - which board fails, - where to > find the toolchain binaries ready to use for PPC (Ubuntu > package?), - if all other arches have been build-tested in order to > avoid new issues popping out later. P1021RDB-PC_NAND fails and I use ELDK 5.2 for a toolchain for PowerPC. - -- Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRZuluAAoJENk4IS6UOR1WxeQP/2X5/dNDz2DyMnd6qaSxZMEG 2wlMRkGjOe8vA47R0NzqS5KyUMhwvMZAhebk798lRjqkY/t5cdFy1sXEnWI3kod3 z4j456bpoQpfbctsaqHw0nCDU/HKBW53BDsFIRTA++2obeZ3Ywmj+TQxkefAgBJY UoyL33yZKC2M+CjeCKMaHJlmBYEkhthLxYn84zedoN/L8RZi66DXQ5QuGitRWZPL DfewModX/KNvjyjyJNca4fGymT0PtWvB3gS39Kju9qcF9iSp/aTlla5/xdVx1gY5 FvnXheabmp1iNkyKD/783HExBkbVg99aMWJAo8ARc9HfbZwgY8Dlji7hdVWGXPYG +RWgPwIp4PdKYTZnC5BK/sAHzWAVMv9iOxzkunxSbla9ULMysh1kPD9x+PVECo57 gJ9Eutui9q5NSLSUF/cIx2NXB9977ScYiFvy5+DX7MxytZvjOOQKor99qA9SqSYJ kiOybsKtlemfR+wAxPy2hGvxf5CUX/Yc6NPk16x74kQ3bZIy+0/Z8hWkGpRTqDY6 jW8jDtDv90YwnDYVEsQBEoCyBjr/5g2a3sOuTUBhYszMTzC+eJVn8nVaMqyiWPpX DBGMHC0o9pHJva1jVMf7AH7Q/uD4oUVmZRiSNpZ1znct1WU6D3ik/pTbsG+v3wIE Qa2PbeHT2Y8Pe3uFzFLN =2cE2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----