From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:42:24 +0530
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5][v3] board/p1010rdb:Add NAND boot support
 using new SPL format
In-Reply-To: <1365709387.3640.6@snotra>
References: <1365709387.3640.6@snotra>
Message-ID: <516789A8.5060901@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 04/12/2013 01:13 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 04/11/2013 02:25:22 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/configs/P1010RDB.h b/include/configs/P1010RDB.h
>> index 437ee6e..a6ef276 100644
>> --- a/include/configs/P1010RDB.h
>> +++ b/include/configs/P1010RDB.h
>> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_P1010RDB
>>  #define CONFIG_P1010
>> +#define CONFIG_E500            /* BOOKE e500 family */
>> +#include <asm/config_mpc85xx.h>
>>  #define CONFIG_NAND_FSL_IFC
>>  #endif
>
> Why is this inside the P1010RDB ifdef?  Why do we even have a 
> CONFIG_P1010RDB?  What other boards use this file

I am supposed to put config_mpc85xx.h after  CONFIG_P1010 define. That's 
why put under CONFIG_P1010RDB.
CONFIG_P1010RDB is not being used for P1010 as no other board using this 
file. It can be removed.

Just to guess may be there were plan to add make target for 
P1014(Personality of P1010). but it never happened as it is taken care 
by reading svr.
I will update it.

Regards,
Prabhakar