[U-Boot] [PATCH] make hang() a weak function

["Andreas Bießmann" <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>]

Hi Albert,

On 04/16/2013 01:36 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:14:09 +0200, Andreas Bie?mann
> <andreas.devel@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
>> This patch also does some minor coding style cleanups.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Bie?mann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
>>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/lib/board.c            |    3 ++-
>>  arch/avr32/lib/board.c          |    3 ++-
>>  arch/blackfin/lib/board.c       |    3 ++-
>>  arch/m68k/lib/board.c           |    3 ++-
>>  arch/microblaze/lib/board.c     |    5 +++--
>>  arch/mips/lib/board.c           |    3 ++-
>>  arch/nds32/lib/board.c          |    3 ++-
>>  arch/nios2/lib/board.c          |    5 +++--
>>  arch/openrisc/lib/board.c       |    3 ++-
>>  arch/powerpc/lib/board.c        |    4 ++--
>>  arch/sandbox/lib/board.c        |    3 ++-
>>  arch/sh/lib/board.c             |    3 ++-
>>  arch/sparc/lib/board.c          |    3 ++-
>>  arch/x86/lib/board.c            |    3 ++-
>>  common/board_f.c                |    3 ++-
>>  common/spl/spl.c                |    3 ++-
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand_spl.c |    3 ++-
>>  17 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

<snip>

> 
> Apart from Stefan's comments: considered standalone, doesn't this patch
> have zero effect? I suspect you intend to use this in a later patch,
> and if so, I would suggest grouping these in a series so that the
> subsequent patch(es) explain this one.

I would like to use a specialized hang() for a not mainlined board, thus
there will no more patches using this currently.

Best regards

Andreas Bie?mann