public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx23: Put back RAM voltage level to its original value
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:09:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <517BB201.90903@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201304270133.42529.marex@denx.de>

On 27/04/2013 01:33, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Otavio Salvador,
> 

Hi Fabio, Otavio, Marek,

>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>> Dear Otavio Salvador,
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>>>>> strange at best and I don't like it. I think that's also the source
>>>>>> of our problems, the DRAM suffers undervolt and quickly afterwards
>>>>>> is configured for regular operation ... I'd say check
>>>>>> mx23_mem_setup_vddmem() and inspect the result with a scope. I think
>>>>>> we need some slow ramping function like mxs_power_set_vddx().
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, but can we have this patch applied and do this investigation in
>>>>> parallel?
>>>>>
>>>>> At least we could have U-boot usable on mx23 again.
>>>>
>>>> I also vote for it to be applied and then do this investigation in
>>>> parallel. Even if there're still pending issues it does improve the
>>>> current status.
>>>
>>> But someone has to do this! And so far I see noone capable/willing to do
>>> that :(
>>
>> Oh really? Fabio, other people and me are doing it. We have some
>> people helping to debug it and using their time to help testing it so
>> it seems like a false accusation.
> 
> it == grabbing a scope and doing the real measurement :(
> 
>> So as I said, I see no reason to not get this patch in for now.
> 
> I am not against in per-se. I am worried noone will come up with real fix when 
> there is a "good enough plaster" put on to cover the real problem.

I agree that we have not yet found a clear cause of the behavior - but
ler me say that is quite bound to the hardware and how voltage is
applied to the DDR. As the patch reports to allow to boot kernel in most
cases, I agree with Fabio to apply this - and IMHO most investigation
should be done by the hardware developers.

Best regards,
Stefano

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-27 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-26 16:01 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx23: Put back RAM voltage level to its original value Fabio Estevam
2013-04-26 16:20 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-26 17:14   ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-26 18:21     ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-26 21:08       ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-26 21:11         ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-26 16:24 ` Eric Bénard
2013-04-26 17:17   ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-26 18:16     ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-26 19:42       ` Eric Bénard
2013-04-26 20:08       ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-26 20:13         ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-26 20:58           ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-26 23:01             ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-26 23:33               ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-27 11:09                 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2013-04-27 11:34                   ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-27 17:28                   ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-27 17:53                     ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-27 18:39                       ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-26 20:56         ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-26 21:10           ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-26 21:14             ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-26 20:58       ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-26 21:07         ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-26 18:14 ` Robert Nelson
2013-04-28  9:06 ` Stefano Babic
2013-04-28 23:06 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-28 23:19   ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=517BB201.90903@denx.de \
    --to=sbabic@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox