public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] CAN framework in U-Boot
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 11:08:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51822D21.6090803@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFTCetQJtLC_AJJdD3zQNGLDPzgfvAvNZjSMmp3NXTiEDPpogg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Bhupesh,

On 05/02/2013 10:51 AM, Bhupesh SHARMA wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
> 
> Thanks for your timely inputs.
> 
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>wrote:
> 
>> Hi Bhupesh,
>>
>> On 05/01/2013 06:17 AM, Bhupesh SHARMA wrote:
>>> Hi Wolfgang G. and list,
>>>
>>> I was looking to do some basic tests on a C_CAN module inside our SOC at
>>> u-boot
>>> level, till the Linux OS is up and working to test basic CAN features.
>>>
>>> I couldn't figure out if CAN framework is supported in u-boot and would
>>> really appreciate if
>>> someone can help me out regarding the same.
>>>
>>> I could see the sja1000 header present inside 'include/sja1000.h', and
>> some
>>> old patches
>>> from Wolfgang G. (see [1]), but couldn't figure out if these patches were
>>> accepted into u-boot.
>>>
>>> Any help will be much appreaciated.
>>>
>>> [1]. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/70864
>>
>> There is no generic CAN interface in U-Boot yet. The "sja1000.h" header
>> file is used for some basic CAN loopback test commands and there are
>> others, e.g. for the MSCAN. I have hacked something recently for Flexcan:
>>
>> +U_BOOT_CMD(
>> +       can_test,       CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS,     1,      do_can_test,
>> +       "transfer and check messages between two CAN controllers",
>> +       "[kb-per-sec] [repeat-count]"
>> +);
>>
>> Unfortunately, those commands are all board specific. A more generic
>> approach is appreciated, of course.
>>
> Yes. I would like to explore the possibility of adding some generic CAN
> framework to u-boot.
> Do you think your last patches, will be a good starting point?

Well, there is "The U-Boot Driver Model Project" and CAN should use it
as well, I think. Have a look to "doc/driver-model" for further information.

> I can try to test the same on flexcan as well.

Note that this driver just implements the command "can_test".
It's also not yet mainline but I can post it on request.

Wolfgang.

      reply	other threads:[~2013-05-02  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-01  4:17 [U-Boot] CAN framework in U-Boot Bhupesh SHARMA
2013-05-02  7:01 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-05-02  8:51   ` Bhupesh SHARMA
2013-05-02  9:08     ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51822D21.6090803@grandegger.com \
    --to=wg@grandegger.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox