[U-Boot] U-Boot OMAP issues

[U-Boot] U-Boot OMAP issues

[Lubomir Popov]

Hi Tom,

On 29/05/13 16:24, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 05/29/2013 02:34 AM, Lubomir Popov wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 29.05.2013 01:55, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2013 02:44 PM, Lubomir Popov wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> P.S. I have an updated version of the I2C driver patch, with some
>>>>>>> minor
>>>>>>> improvements (mainly on identification of unconfigured bus). Should I
>>>>>>> submit it, what are you plans in respect to I2C?
>>>>>> Yes, please submit the i2c driver changes, I shall take them in some
>>>>>> form or another soon.
>>>>> OK, can even try to do this now from here.
>>>> Submitted - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/246204/
>>>> Looking at it again, I tend to dislike this solution more and more.
>>>> Ugly ifdef-ed code. Couldn't we reconsider again adding this as a new
>>>> driver, built for those SoCs that are confirmed to work (OMAP4 and 5
>>>> for sure)?
>>> Lets take another swag at this.  Update the functions for everyone and
>>> I'll get some omap3 testing done.
>> OK, but you shall have to either entirely remove the ifdefs and the old
>> functions, or edit the
>> #if defined(CONFIG_OMAPxxxx)... conditions to include the SoC types you
>> are testing on.
> 
> Yeah.  If you don't repost the patch with just always using the new
> functions, I'll do some local yanking out.  I kinda hope to pencil that
> in as my task for tomorrow.  Thanks :)
> 
OK, I shall do it now. Does it matter if I base on u-boot-ti, or on mainline?
Guess not...

Regards,
Lubo