From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerry Van Baren Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 12:34:55 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: allow bootdelay to be specified via device tree In-Reply-To: <51ACB0BE.6060009@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1368554576-19733-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <51AAD707.3040009@nvidia.com> <51AB3E2E.1060004@cideas.com> <51ACB0BE.6060009@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <51ACC5AF.2000202@cideas.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 06/03/2013 11:05 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/02/2013 06:44 AM, Gerald Van Baren wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On 06/02/2013 01:24 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 05/14/2013 12:02 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> From: Stephen Warren >>>> >>>> This can be useful to force bootcmd to execute as soon as U-Boot has >>>> started. >>>> >>>> My use-case is: An SoC-specific tool pushes U-Boot into RAM, along with >>>> an image to be written to device boot flash, with the DT config property >>>> "bootcmd" set to contain a command to write that image to flash. In this >>>> scenario, we don't want to allow any stale bootdelay value taken from >>>> the current flash content to affect how long it takes before the >>>> flashing process starts. >>> >>> Jerry, does this patch look OK, or do you have comments on it? Thanks. >> >> I'm good with the patch. >> >> Acked-by: Gerald Van Baren > > Oh, I'm not sure who you're expecting to apply this then; I assume since > it was a DT-related feature it'd be applied to your DT tree. Are you > expecting Tom Rini to apply it to the main U-Boot repo? Ahh, one of those fuzzy gray areas... the patch is to main.c, I mostly focus on files in the libfdt subdirectory. I can apply it via the FDT repo. Tom Rini, do you have any preference? The merge window closed May 11 and the original patch was emailed on May 14... is it a candidate to go into the July 15 release? It is a simple patch arguably fixing a bug, but it did miss the window. Thanks, gvb