From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeroen Hofstee Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:54:33 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Optimize ARM relocation In-Reply-To: <20130613110545.5e3c1708@lilith> References: <1369724512-4047-1-git-send-email-albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> <1370953055-13482-1-git-send-email-albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> <20130611144729.5bbf542b@lilith> <20130613110545.5e3c1708@lilith> Message-ID: <51BA1569.7010103@myspectrum.nl> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 06/13/2013 11:05 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:47:29 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD > wrote: > >> Hi Albert, >> >> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:17:29 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD >> wrote: >> >>> This series optimizes relocation by ensuring ARM >>> binaries only use one type of relocation record, >>> R_ARM_RELATIVE., then optimizing relocation code >>> accordingly. >> This is a cosmetic version only; if no one complains loudly, this >> will be the final version too. >> >> So people, as this touches ARM relocation, I would appreciate it if a >> few people could test it on their own ARM HW target and see if they >> still get a prompt, if command completion still works, etc. > Lubo has tested on a custom ARM board, my thanks to him. > > Anyone else would be so kind as to do a quick test on their ARM boards? > > Amicalement, Tested-by: Jeroen Hofstee arm-master + these patches on a twister (am3517) with gcc / Linaro 4.7.2. Will have a look at clang. Regards, Jeroen am35