[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm, am33xx: move s_init to a common place

[Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>]

Hello Tom,

Am 13.06.2013 17:53, schrieb Tom Rini:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 05:53:17AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> 
>> move s_init from every board code to a common place.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
>> Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@ti.com>
>> Cc: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>
>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
>> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@iseebcn.com>
>>
>> ---
>> This patch is based on the following patches:
>>
>> - [U-Boot,v2] arm, am33xx: move rtc32k_enable() to common place
>>   http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/248908/
>>
>> - [U-Boot] arm, am33xx: move uart soft reset code to common place
>>   http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/248508/
> 
> These two apply best to u-boot-ti, and with them this patch doesn't
> apply cleanly.  Please sort that out.

I based my patches on u-boot ... I look at this ..

> The following adds moving ti814x_evm into the mix and I've sent Matt
> some binaries to give a whirl to test on the board:
> 
[...]
>  /*
>   * Basic board specific setup.  Pinmux has been handled already.
> 
> Please fold into v2
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>

Ok, thanks!

BTW:
I just realized that I have on one of the three boards a problem,
that in spl code calling the rtc32k_enable() crashes ... which
votes against moving this to a common place ... I haveno real idea
why ... did you heard from such a behaviour? Is there some am335x
soc, which differs from the others?

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany