public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] nand onfi 8bit/16bit bus support
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:32:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C293EA.2000905@monstr.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371662241.9073.35@snotra>

On 06/19/2013 07:17 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/19/2013 08:40:19 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> On 05/09/2013 11:37 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On 05/06/2013 11:53:52 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> >> Hi guys,
>> >>
>> >> Zynq supports 8 and 16bit ONFI nand flashes.
>> >> We can count number of connected pins and from that
>> >> we know if 8bit or 16bit nand flash is used.
>> >>
>> >> I have looked at the code and contains ONFI detection
>> >> with correct detection of bus width + checking later.
>> >> Why also not setup proper chip->options for NAND_BUSWIDTH_16?
>> >>
>> >> Not sure how others but if driver expect just ONFI devices
>> >> and support 8 and 16bit options why not just to setup
>> >> chip options based on information from ONFI or
>> >> not check that (busw != (chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16))
>> >> for onfi case.
>> >
>> > This is fixed in current Linux, with NAND_BUSWIDTH_AUTO.  There was a patchset to merge in recent Linux MTD code a while back, but an expected respin didn't come.  I'll try to fix it up when I process this merge window's patches.
>>
>> Have you done this change?
>> I have grepped the latest version and I can't see it there.
> 
> MTD from 3.7.1 (which was what was current when the patch was posted months ago) was merged in.  
> It looks like NAND_BUSWIDTH_AUTO was added in 3.8.  We can do another MTD update in the next merge window,
> which would pick this up.  Or if you'd like to submit a patch that just fixes this problem 
> (in the same way as in Linux, so it doesn't conflict too badly when we do the merge), it could be applied now as a bugfix.

Ah ok. From my point of view it is not bug fix but new features and should go to the u-boot
in proper merge window.
No problem to wait just wanted to get update on this to be able to better plan our work.

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20130620/228b9908/attachment.pgp>

      reply	other threads:[~2013-06-20  5:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-06 16:53 [U-Boot] nand onfi 8bit/16bit bus support Michal Simek
2013-05-09 21:37 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-10  5:57   ` Michal Simek
2013-06-19 13:40   ` Michal Simek
2013-06-19 17:17     ` Scott Wood
2013-06-20  5:32       ` Michal Simek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C293EA.2000905@monstr.eu \
    --to=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox