From: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] powerpc/mpc85xx:Disable Debug TLB entry before init_tlbs
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:07:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C91E76.2000504@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372095700.8183.2@snotra>
On 06/24/2013 11:11 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/24/2013 01:17:11 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
>> On 06/24/2013 08:44 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
>>> On 06/22/2013 02:42 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>> On 06/21/2013 04:05:37 PM, Fleming Andy-AFLEMING wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 21, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > On 06/21/2013 03:38:48 PM, Andy Fleming wrote:
>>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:14:00AM +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >> > init_tlbs() initialize all the TLB entries required for the
>>>>> system.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > So disable DEBUG TLB entry before TLB entries initialization.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
>>>>> >> Applied, with fixes.
>>>>> >> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init_early.c
>>>>> b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init_early.c
>>>>> >> > index f4403c2..340b063 100644
>>>>> >> > --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init_early.c
>>>>> >> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init_early.c
>>>>> >> > @@ -180,5 +180,9 @@ void cpu_init_early_f(void)
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > invalidate_tlb(1);
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_PPC_E500_DEBUG_TLB) &&
>>>>> !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
>>>>> >> > + disable_tlb(CONFIG_SYS_PPC_E500_DEBUG_TLB);
>>>>> >> > +#endif
>>>>> >> Had to add CONFIG_NAND_SPL here, as well, just for future
>>>>> reference
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Why exclude all SPLs? Only minimal SPLs skip creating the debug
>>>>> TLB.
>>>>>
>>>>> The definition of disable_tlb() is excluded when NAND_SPL is defined.
>>>>
>>>> I'm talking about new-SPL, not NAND_SPL. My comment is about the
>>>> original patch (I made the comment before internally), not your
>>>> edit to it.
>>>>
>>> as per comment from Scott, we should have below define. It takes
>>> care of SPL minimal + nand_spl
>>>
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_SYS_PPC_E500_DEBUG_TLB) &&
>>> !defined(CONFIG_SPL_INIT_MINIMAL) && !defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL)
>>>
>>> May I resend this patch?
>
> It would need to be:
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_SYS_PPC_E500_DEBUG_TLB) && \
> !(defined(CONFIG_SPL_INIT_MINIMAL) && defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)) && \
> !defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL)
>
>> just a afterthought, current modified* patch is correct i.e. " #if
>> defined(CONFIG_SYS_PPC_E500_DEBUG_TLB) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
>> && !defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL)"
>> DEBUG TLB never been created for SPL & NAND_SPL so no need to disable.
>
> Why would the debug TLB not be created for a non-minimal-init SPL?
>
Looks like my assumption is *wrong*. as per this define
#if defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL) || \
(defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) && defined(CONFIG_SPL_INIT_MINIMAL))
#define MINIMAL_SPL
#endif
MINIMAL_SPL is defined only with CONFIG_SPL_INIT_MINIMAL. for
MINIMAL_SPL interrupt vectors are never relocated. hence, no need of
DEBUG TLB entry.
for rest, interrupt vectors are relocated, so debug tlb entry is must.
I will post a patch upstream to fix this problem.
Thanks,
Prabhakar
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 4:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-13 4:44 [U-Boot] [PATCH][v2] powerpc/mpc85xx:Disable Debug TLB entry before init_tlbs Prabhakar Kushwaha
2013-06-21 20:38 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] " Andy Fleming
2013-06-21 20:59 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-21 21:05 ` Fleming Andy-AFLEMING
2013-06-21 21:12 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-24 3:14 ` Prabhakar Kushwaha
2013-06-24 6:17 ` Prabhakar Kushwaha
2013-06-24 17:41 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-25 4:37 ` Prabhakar Kushwaha [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C91E76.2000504@freescale.com \
--to=prabhakar@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox