From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Bie=DFmann?= <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 14:56:23 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [ANN] v2013.07-rc2
In-Reply-To: <51D2C8DC.9080801@ti.com>
References: <20130628221222.GM28078@bill-the-cat>
	<CAOCHtYjD-v+XisPkDc2n9Rth73LqEuoB9070gBAKwcmxYQ-fLw@mail.gmail.com>
	<51D2AD6A.1030708@gmail.com> <51D2C8DC.9080801@ti.com>
Message-ID: <51D2CDF7.5090602@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 07/02/2013 02:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 06:37 AM, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
>> Hi,
> 
>> On 07/01/2013 10:44 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
>>>> Hey all,
>>>>
>>>> I've tagged and pushed v2013.07-rc2.  A bit more over the place
>>>> than I should have gone, but picked up a lot of things that
>>>> have been outstanding for a while.  The big thing is a refactor
>>>> of the boot loop. Everything should be working right now, but
>>>> please test.  Related to this is the ability to have
>>>> crytpographically signed images.  It's like secure boot in UEFI
>>>> land, but hopefully without the kerfuffle.
>>>>
>>>> If you've got changes outstanding still, please start gently
>>>> poking custodians with patchwork links.  I've got a good bit of
>>>> stuff I need to deal with myself still, but please prod me all
>>>> the same.
>>>
>>> So, the bootm refactor ( 35fc84fa1ff51e15ecd3e464dac87eb105ffed30
>>> ) also broke bootz/zImage...
> 
>> and also bootm for uImage on avr32 ... will investigate it these
>> days.
> 
> Hurk, I hope avr32 is the same problem Stefan found/fixed with
> PowerPC, can you check / test that quickly?  See last patch to
> arch/powerpc/lib/bootm.c.

got it: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/256393/

Let it settle some days, would you pick it directly or do you prefer a PR?

Best regards

Andreas Bie?mann