From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Babic Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:14:06 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6qsabrelite: Remove mx6qsabrelite code in favor of nitrogen6x In-Reply-To: <1373856014-20390-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> References: <1373856014-20390-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> Message-ID: <51E3A13E.4040101@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Fabio, On 15/07/2013 04:40, Fabio Estevam wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam > > mx6qsabrelite and nitrogen6q boards are hardware compatible, so let's avoid the > code duplication and only use the nitrogen6x source code to make board code > maintainance easier. > > Tested booting a mainline device tree kernel on a mx6qsabrelite board. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- > .../nitrogen6x/README.mx6qsabrelite} | 0 > .../nitrogen6x/{README => README.nitrogen6x} | 0 > board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/Makefile | 41 - > board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c | 848 --------------------- > boards.cfg | 2 +- > include/configs/mx6qsabrelite.h | 297 -------- > include/configs/nitrogen6x.h | 80 +- Should we update the MAINTAINERS, too ? It is weird that we have two maintainers for the same code. Best regards, Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de =====================================================================