public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@linaro.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/7] ARM: add SMP support for non-secure switch
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:51:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F7A8C5.6070607@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130729220233.GC26768@cbox>

On 07/30/2013 12:02 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:54:17AM +0200, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Currently the non-secure switch is only done for the boot processor.
>> To enable full SMP support, we have to switch all secondary cores
>> into non-secure state also.
>>
>> So we add an entry point for secondary CPUs coming out of low-power
>> state and make sure we put them into WFI again after having switched
>> to non-secure state.
>> For this we acknowledge and EOI the wake-up IPI, then go into WFI.
>> Once being kicked out of it later, we sanity check that the start
>> address has actually been changed (since another attempt to switch
>> to non-secure would block the core) and jump to the new address.
>>
>> The actual CPU kick is done by sending an inter-processor interrupt
>> via the GIC to all CPU interfaces except the requesting processor.
>> The secondary cores will then setup their respective GIC CPU
>> interface.
>>
>> The address secondary cores jump to is board specific, we provide
>> the value here for the Versatile Express board.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/cpu/armv7/nonsec_virt.S    | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-v7.c        | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>   arch/arm/include/asm/armv7.h        |  1 +
>>   arch/arm/include/asm/gic.h          |  2 ++
>>   include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h |  3 +++
>>   5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/nonsec_virt.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/nonsec_virt.S
>> index e9ee831..f9b6b39 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/nonsec_virt.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/nonsec_virt.S
>> @@ -58,6 +58,33 @@ _secure_monitor:
>>   	movs	pc, lr				@ return to non-secure SVC
>>
>>   /*
>> + * Secondary CPUs start here and call the code for the core specific parts
>> + * of the non-secure and HYP mode transition. The GIC distributor specific
>> + * code has already been executed by a C function before.
>> + * Then they go back to wfi and wait to be woken up by the kernel again.
>> + */
>> +ENTRY(_smp_pen)
>> +	mrs	r0, cpsr
>> +	orr	r0, r0, #0xc0
>> +	msr	cpsr, r0			@ disable interrupts
>> +	ldr	r1, =_start
>> +	mcr	p15, 0, r1, c12, c0, 0		@ set VBAR
>> +
>> +	bl	_nonsec_init
>> +
>> +	ldr	r1, [r0, #GICC_IAR]		@ acknowledge IPI
>> +	str	r1, [r0, #GICC_EOIR]		@ signal end of interrupt
>> +	adr	r1, _smp_pen
>> +waitloop:
>> +	wfi
>> +	ldr	r0, =CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_ADDR	@ load start address
>
> You seem to have ignored my comment about using the sysflags name?
>
> As I understand, the sysflags name is a versatile express specific
> register name that just happens to be used for the SMP boot address as
> well...
>
> Therefore, this should really be CONFIG_SMP_BOOT_ADDR or something like
> that, at the very least.

>
>> +	ldr	r0, [r0]
>> +	cmp	r0, r1			@ make sure we dont execute this code
>> +	beq	waitloop		@ again (due to a spurious wakeup)
>> +	mov	pc, r0
>> +ENDPROC(_smp_pen)
>> +
>> +/*
>>    * Switch a core to non-secure state.
>>    *
>>    *  1. initialize the GIC per-core interface
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-v7.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-v7.c
>> index 54f9746..a0d0b34 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-v7.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-v7.c
>> @@ -77,6 +77,21 @@ static int get_gicd_base_address(unsigned int *gicdaddr)
>>   #endif
>>   }
>>
>> +static void kick_secondary_cpus(unsigned int gicdaddr)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned int *secondary_boot_addr;
>> +
>> +	secondary_boot_addr = (void *)CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_ADDR;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_NEED_CLEAR_BITS
>> +	secondary_boot_addr[1] = (unsigned)-1;
>> +#endif
>
> again, if you disagreed with my previous comment, please comment on it
> and rationalize your choice.

I am sorry, I thought I reasoned that already in an earlier mail:
I don't want to introduce abstraction prematurely, so I wanted to 
refactor the code as soon as a second board gets supported. Which will 
probably be the Arndale, and also probably done by me ...

> I still feel you're wrapping board specific logic into generic code, and
> that you should call out to a more generic function.  Imagine an SOC
> that uses an implementation defined control register for this instead of
> a memory address...

Well, I can imagine quite some ways to do this, but in fact I'd like to 
focus on things that really exist ;-)
My fear is that any abstraction I introduce now will not suffice for a 
future board and needs to be refactored then anyway.

Regards,
Andre.

>
> perhaps what you need is:
>
> void set_board_smp_boot_addr(unsigned long addr);
> unsigned long get_board_smp_boot_addr(void);
>
> and call these instead of your direct use of sysflags addr here...?
>
>> +	*secondary_boot_addr = (uintptr_t)_smp_pen;
>> +	dmb();
>> +
>> +	/* now kick all CPUs (except this one) by writing to GICD_SGIR */
>> +	writel(1U << 24, gicdaddr + GICD_SGIR);
>> +}
>> +
>>   enum nonsec_virt_errors armv7_switch_nonsec(void)
>>   {
>>   	unsigned int reg, ret;
>> @@ -110,7 +125,9 @@ enum nonsec_virt_errors armv7_switch_nonsec(void)
>>   	for (i = 0; i <= itlinesnr; i++)
>>   		writel((unsigned)-1, gicdaddr + GICD_IGROUPRn + 4 * i);
>>
>> -	/* call the non-sec switching code on this CPU */
>> +	kick_secondary_cpus(gicdaddr);
>> +
>> +	/* call the non-sec switching code on this CPU also */
>>   	_nonsec_init();
>>
>>   	return NONSEC_VIRT_SUCCESS;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/armv7.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/armv7.h
>> index e5c0279..f6582a1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/armv7.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/armv7.h
>> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ enum nonsec_virt_errors armv7_switch_nonsec(void);
>>
>>   /* defined in assembly file */
>>   unsigned int _nonsec_init(void);
>> +void _smp_pen(void);
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_ARMV7_NONSEC */
>>
>>   #endif /* ! __ASSEMBLY__ */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/gic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/gic.h
>> index c2b1e28..a0891cc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/gic.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/gic.h
>> @@ -13,5 +13,7 @@
>>   #define GIC_CPU_OFFSET_A15	0x2000
>>   #define GICC_CTLR		0x0000
>>   #define GICC_PMR		0x0004
>> +#define GICC_IAR		0x000C
>> +#define GICC_EOIR		0x0010
>>
>>   #endif
>> diff --git a/include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h b/include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h
>> index 4f425ac..ade9e5b 100644
>> --- a/include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h
>> +++ b/include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h
>> @@ -31,4 +31,7 @@
>>   #include "vexpress_common.h"
>>   #define CONFIG_BOOTP_VCI_STRING     "U-boot.armv7.vexpress_ca15x2_tc2"
>>
>> +#define CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_ADDR 0x1c010030
>> +#define CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_NEED_CLEAR_BITS
>> +
>>   #endif
>> --
>> 1.7.12.1
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-30 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-09 23:54 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/7] ARMv7: Add HYP mode switching support Andre Przywara
2013-07-09 23:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/7] ARM: prepare armv7.h to be included from assembly source Andre Przywara
2013-07-09 23:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/7] ARM: add secure monitor handler to switch to non-secure state Andre Przywara
2013-07-29 22:02   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-07-30 11:38     ` Andre Przywara
2013-07-09 23:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/7] ARM: add assembly routine " Andre Przywara
2013-07-10 12:47   ` Nikolay Nikolaev
2013-07-09 23:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/7] ARM: switch to non-secure state during bootm execution Andre Przywara
2013-07-10 12:49   ` Nikolay Nikolaev
2013-07-29 22:02   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-07-30 11:32     ` Andre Przywara
2013-07-30 14:23       ` Christoffer Dall
2013-07-09 23:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/7] ARM: add SMP support for non-secure switch Andre Przywara
2013-07-29 22:02   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-07-30 11:51     ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2013-07-30 14:28       ` Christoffer Dall
2013-07-09 23:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/7] ARM: extend non-secure switch to also go into HYP mode Andre Przywara
2013-07-29 22:02   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-07-30 11:59     ` Andre Przywara
2013-07-30 14:31       ` Christoffer Dall
2013-08-05  5:15   ` Masahiro Yamada
2013-07-09 23:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 7/7] ARM: VExpress: enable ARMv7 virt support for VExpress A15 Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51F7A8C5.6070607@linaro.org \
    --to=andre.przywara@linaro.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox