[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/8] am335x: NOR support

[Mark Jackson <mpfj-list@newflow.co.uk>]

On 13/08/13 16:20, Mark Jackson wrote:
> On 13/08/13 16:11, Tom Rini wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 08/13/2013 11:06 AM, Mark Jackson wrote:
>>> On 13/08/13 16:00, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> On 08/13/2013 10:57 AM, Mark Jackson wrote:
>>>>> On 30/07/13 14:28, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 03:12:57PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This series adds NOR support to am335x_evm, along with a 
>>>>>>> few generic changes to make gpmc clearer (for per-board 
>>>>>>> things like different NOR chips, etc).  This series
>>>>>>> depends on the last go-round of the am335x falcon mode docs
>>>>>>> as that adds the README that I add more content to. And
>>>>>>> while I say this in 3/8, to be clear, I expect to drop 3/8
>>>>>>> in favor of Justin Waters' way of doing this instead, I
>>>>>>> just include this here for completeness and will get it all
>>>>>>> happy together when I assemble things in u-boot-ti.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The big changes in v4 are: - Apply again to master which 
>>>>>>> includes a few non-trivial updates, so the linker script 
>>>>>>> got re-synced. - After checking what's going on, and 
>>>>>>> testing with NAND again, we can be common with 
>>>>>>> gpmc_cfg->irqstatus/enable, and only set documented bits
>>>>>>> in gpmc_cfg->config
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm now rebasing our NanoBone code onto the TI uboot code, but 
>>>>> I'm coming up with the original issue [1] of having to not 
>>>>> check for the R_ARM_RELATIVE relocations again.
>>>>
>>>> Your linker script is out of sync with arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
>>>
>>> Strange ... since the am335x nor_boot compile appeared to work 
>>> fine, I just copied the script from board/ti/am335x, and assumed
>>> it would work fine for me (with a library path change).
>>>
>>> So does this TI file also need updating ?
>>>
>>> Either way, my code now compiles.
>>
>> I had to re-sync the TI one in this series as well.  Double check
>> between what you have working now vs before, there's a few small
>> changes there...
> 
> Doh ... I was copying the script from the non-TI branch of uboot !!
> 
> :-(
> 

Well the code seems to work apart from I get no networking.

We have dual ethernet, so I'll have to do some digging.