From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:42:46 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] RFC: tegra: Avoid using I2C prior to relocation
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ1xUFJD4wFm4Oi3bU4NKTzEOOs_ktgKumuZV0bz75PGCg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1375854747-3621-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org>
	<520273B1.30200@wwwdotorg.org> <520578A0.4080107@wwwdotorg.org>
	<CAPnjgZ0hbmVWG7zZzth0tHyv2naK9=fNn_44TDFn+mLziUQrPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5FBF8E85CA34454794F0F7ECBA79798F37AF25669A@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com>
	<CAPnjgZ1xUFJD4wFm4Oi3bU4NKTzEOOs_ktgKumuZV0bz75PGCg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <520A8C36.6020509@wwwdotorg.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 08/13/2013 01:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Tom Warren <TWarren@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>> Simon,
>>
>> From: sjg at google.com [mailto:sjg at google.com] On Behalf Of Simon Glass
...
>> I put tegra: on the front expecting it to go that way, but it doesn't matter. Also your comments did not exactly represent a glowing recommendation.
>>
>> [Tom] It?s still marked RFC ? doesn?t that have to go away before anyone can pick it up / apply it?
> 
> Sorry, I missed this in first reading due to the quoting. I will
> re-issue without RFC.

If that's the only change, you hardly need to repost it to edit the
patch subject; there are many ways of fixing that when applying the patch...