From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valentin Longchamp Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:34:46 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 7/8] mtd/fsl_elbc: take NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH config option into accout In-Reply-To: <1376427259.20487.123.camel@snotra.buserror.net> References: <1374832955-4544-1-git-send-email-valentin.longchamp@keymile.com> <1374832955-4544-8-git-send-email-valentin.longchamp@keymile.com> <1376427259.20487.123.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Message-ID: <52123B16.5080704@keymile.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 08/13/2013 10:54 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 12:02 +0200, Valentin Longchamp wrote: >> NAND_ECC_SOFT was the only option available while the SOFT_BCH option >> may also be used. >> >> Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp >> --- >> drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 6 +++++- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Acked-by: Scott Wood > > Is this for use with http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/168855/ or do you > have a 2K-page NAND that requires more than 1 bit of ECC correction? > We have a 2K-page NAND but we have found out that we need more than 1 bit of ECC correction otherwise with some suppliers we sometimes see uncorrectable bitflips. Valentin