From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 18:23:11 +0800
Subject: [U-Boot] gpmi-nand driver and jffs2 support
In-Reply-To: <52246421.1020900@digi.com>
References: <522062B4.4080709@digi.com> <52206C05.8020701@freescale.com>
	<5220AB35.9080409@digi.com> <20130831025344.GA9971@gmail.com>
	<5220B8F6.3080405@digi.com> <20130831033438.GA13704@gmail.com>
	<5220C8C4.5010305@digi.com>
	<CAOMZO5CTQZBmvQc4y761kGHWYWRXr7GwVrTuTPE+JU=bmjq62w@mail.gmail.com>
	<5220CB56.7040505@digi.com> <20130831133728.GA22069@gmail.com>
	<52244886.8060205@digi.com> <52244B22.3020605@freescale.com>
	<52244F85.4030904@digi.com> <52245171.3050900@freescale.com>
	<52246421.1020900@digi.com>
Message-ID: <5224670F.6000703@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

? 2013?09?02? 18:10, Hector Palacios ??:
> So does this mean that U-Boot is now unable to properly write a JFFS2 
> partition for it to be understood by the linux-next 
For the gpmi nand controller, the uboot is not proper to write a jffs2 now.
> kernel? What is exactly the difference? Does it only affect Freescale 
> NAND controllers?
I think there are many difference. Just diff the nand_base.c, you can 
see there are many patches merged in
the kernel's mtd code, but not exit in the uboot's mtd code.


AFAIK, only the gpmi is affected now.

thanks
Huang Shijie