From: Robert Hodaszi <robert.hodaszi@digi.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: fec: Avoid MX28 bus sync issue
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:15:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5231CC8B.5000205@digi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201309121605.04824.marex@denx.de>
I just brought up two samples, that it was a long-term problem. Now it
is fixed. But if somebody is trying to compile the U-Boot with an older
toolchain, it could cause problems. I had problems with 4.4.6.
Yes, 2k is a lot, and I would not put it on the stack. That was just a
quick fix. It would be nicer to allocate the memory with malloc, and
should do that at initialization time.
Best regards,
Robert Hodaszi
On 2013-09-12 16:05, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Robert Hodaszi,
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry, hopefully that will be a plain-text.
>>
>> There are a lot of bug announcement, just make a search:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33721
> This was apparently fixed three years ago.
>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16660
> And this one six years ago ...
>
>> Also, I printed out the buffer addresses, and that temporary RX buffer
>> was not aligned. So the transmit function rounded it down to the
>> alignment boundary, and so caused invalid data transmission. (By the
>> way. Shouldn't the transmit function check whether the alignment is
>> proper, and throw an error message, instead of round it down? That would
>> make more sense.)
> Looking at the code one more time, it'd make most sense to simply allocate the
> buffer NOT on stack, but with some memalign-kind-of call to avoid this abuse of
> stack. You see, the max packet size is around 2k, which is quite a lot. How does
> this proposal sound to you ?
>
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-12 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-11 23:03 [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: fec: Avoid MX28 bus sync issue Marek Vasut
2013-07-11 23:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-07-12 3:41 ` Alexandre Pereira da Silva
2013-07-12 3:51 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-12 11:37 ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-12 11:39 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-07-12 12:01 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-12 15:08 ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-12 15:50 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-07-12 16:48 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-15 8:58 ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-15 12:30 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-15 15:09 ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-15 15:12 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-15 15:24 ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-16 3:51 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-07-16 4:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-07-16 4:44 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-17 15:55 ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-18 4:12 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-12 10:22 ` Hector Palacios
2013-09-12 10:50 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <52319DE8.5080607@digi.com>
2013-09-12 11:00 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-12 11:02 ` Robert Hodaszi
2013-09-12 14:05 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-12 14:15 ` Robert Hodaszi [this message]
2013-09-12 14:31 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-12 14:32 ` Robert Hodaszi
2013-09-12 15:06 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-12 18:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-09-12 18:39 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-09-12 18:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-09-12 19:37 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-09-13 11:11 ` Robert Hodaszi
2013-09-13 11:13 ` Robert Hodaszi
2013-09-13 14:01 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-13 14:24 ` Robert Hodaszi
2013-09-13 16:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-09-13 16:24 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-13 17:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-09-14 22:05 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-09-12 11:08 ` Robert Hodaszi
2013-09-12 18:12 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-09-12 17:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-07-13 2:43 ` Troy Kisky
2013-07-15 13:41 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-07-15 17:39 ` Troy Kisky
2013-07-15 19:59 ` Troy Kisky
2013-07-15 20:20 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-07-15 20:20 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-07-15 21:18 ` Troy Kisky
2013-07-12 5:57 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-07-12 6:39 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-07-12 11:51 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-12 6:56 ` Stefano Babic
2013-07-12 7:30 ` Stefano Babic
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-15 18:12 Oliver Metz
2013-09-15 18:16 ` Fabio Estevam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5231CC8B.5000205@digi.com \
--to=robert.hodaszi@digi.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox