From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:15:30 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 0/22] i.MX6: Update pad declarations for
 multiple-arch binaries
In-Reply-To: <523344EC.8060106@boundarydevices.com>
References: <1377985130-17239-1-git-send-email-eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
	<CAP9ODKp+A_PiRUh9dUP6b8FeLpAMvvDvOjmsXiSd4rvS=TD2Xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<52237487.4060905@denx.de> <522385B2.7090000@boundarydevices.com>
	<523344EC.8060106@boundarydevices.com>
Message-ID: <52334832.90902@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Eric,

Thanks for your analyses

On 13/09/2013 19:01, Eric Nelson wrote:

> I recommend that we simply adopt the main-line kernel naming,
> and work up a couple of initial patches:

I fully agree - this makes also code more maintainable if we will be in
sync with kernel.

> 
>     1. simply replace all of the names with their main-line
>     equivalent, and
>     2. remove all of the unused (NO_PAD_I,NO_MUX_I) pad
>     declarations
> 

Agree.

> Each of these should be easy to inspect for correctness
> and then we can focus on how to handle the differences
> and produce binaries that support both variants.

I think you proposed the right way to go on ;-)

Best regards,
Stefano Babic

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================