From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Nelson Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:22:58 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/3] i.MX6 (DQ/DLS): consolidate mux and pad names In-Reply-To: <1379366805-22166-1-git-send-email-eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com> References: <1379366805-22166-1-git-send-email-eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com> Message-ID: <523CE6E2.6030204@boundarydevices.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 09/16/2013 02:26 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: > This patch set begins the process of consolidating mux and pad > declarations for the i.MX6 Dual/Quad and Dual-Lite/Solo processor > variants. > > Patch 1 replaces the mux/pad names with their equivalents from > the Linux kernel (from linux-next). This > Patch 2 removes a set of completely useless pad declarations > Patch 3 adds a number of registers that are defined in the Linux > kernel and in the DLS variant, but not in the DQ. > > After this patch, there are still more than 400 pad differences > between the two variants. These represent mux/pad declarations > that are not present in the Linux kernel. A combined list of these > is available at: > http://linode.boundarydevices.com/u-boot-pads.lst > > The majority of these are diagnostic settings and a large number > of these appear unlikely to ever be used. The primary reason this > is being sent as an RFC is to get feedback about what should be > done with them: > 1. Delete them all > 2. Walk through them and delete some and add others > 3. Add them all and consolidate the names. > Shawn and Fabio: I'd like to find out what you think about how to handle the pads that aren't in the kernel tree. Please advise, Eric