From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Miguel_Gon=E7alves?= Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:51:28 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] About patch "S3C24XX: Add support to MINI2416 board" In-Reply-To: <5242AD3C.7000906@samsung.com> References: <523D5C47.8050001@inov.pt> <201309211756.17838.marex@denx.de> <5242997D.6090407@inov.pt> <5242A509.4020800@samsung.com> <5242AA5C.4030001@inov.pt> <5242AD3C.7000906@samsung.com> Message-ID: <5242B220.4090507@inov.pt> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 25-09-2013 10:30, Minkyu Kang wrote: > On 25/09/13 18:18, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: >> Hi Minkyu, >> >> On 25-09-2013 09:55, Minkyu Kang wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On 25/09/13 17:06, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: >>>> On 21-09-2013 16:56, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Precisely one year after my patch submission to add support to the >>>>>> MINI2416 board, seems a good time to ask this question, is there any >>>>>> good reason for not integrating this patch on the u-boot mainline? >>>>>> >>>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134779.html >>> I'm sorry to missing your patches. >>> It seems to stay at mailing queue for a long time. >>> So could you please resend the patchset? >>> Maybe it need some modification about license, maintainer entry,,, >>> >> There is no changes to made. You can find the patchset in the mailing list archive: >> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134779.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134774.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134782.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134778.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134772.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134775.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134781.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134773.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134776.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134783.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134780.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134777.html >> >> or in patchwork: >> >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/185877/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/185884/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/185881/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/185875/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/185878/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/185883/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/185876/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/185879/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/185885/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/185882/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/185880/ >> >> Best regards, >> Jos? Gon?alves >> > I mean, your patch will not be applied to current tree clearly. > OK, I will rebase that patchset on the current tree (can't promise it for soon, though). Don't you have any comments on it before I resubmit? Best regards, Jos? Gon?alves