From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Timur Tabi <timur@tabi.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 07:05:35 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9][v2] net: tsec: Use portable types and
 accessors for BDs
In-Reply-To: <52528A18.6090407@freescale.com>
References: <1380752101.12932.127.camel@snotra.buserror.net>
	<1380800932-22552-1-git-send-email-claudiu.manoil@freescale.com>
	<1380825428.12932.154.camel@snotra.buserror.net>
	<524E7BEA.2070103@freescale.com>
	<1380901846.7979.2.camel@snotra.buserror.net>
	<524EEC04.1030105@freescale.com>
	<CAOZdJXW8L-S+ETfumF-UfqpBhjj=bRnfDwuaFTiz5mQ+fUCpSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<52528A18.6090407@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <5252A38F.9070305@tabi.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Claudiu Manoil wrote:
> I think you're suggesting that virt_to_phys() should be used
> to fix that, right?

Yes.

> However, virt_to_phys() is equivalent to that
> simple cast in most cases as there's no CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT for the
> platforms with eTSEC. I'm actually not sure if there's a platform
> with eTSEC for which that cast wouldn't be enough.

Freescale might create a eTSEC-compatible 10G NIC one day that does run 
on e6500 cores.

> If so, it should be a separate patch as this fix would apply to
> existing (old) code and is out of the scope of this patch about
> portable accessors.

Fair enough.