[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: fdt support: Add usbethaddr as an acceptable MAC

[Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>]

All

On 10/02/2013 03:21 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Tom
>
> On 10/02/2013 03:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 03:14:26PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> On 10/02/2013 02:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:00:15PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A board that has a USB ethernet device only may set the usbetheraddr
>>>>> and not the ethaddr.
>>>>> ethaddr will be the default MAC address that is chosen and if that
>>>>> is not populated then the usbethaddr is looked at.  If neither are set
>>>>> then then device tree blob is not modified.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  common/fdt_support.c |   12 +++++++++++-
>>>>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/common/fdt_support.c b/common/fdt_support.c
>>>>> index b034c98..fef7e60 100644
>>>>> --- a/common/fdt_support.c
>>>>> +++ b/common/fdt_support.c
>>>>> @@ -450,8 +450,18 @@ void fdt_fixup_ethernet(void *fdt)
>>>>>  	if (node < 0)
>>>>>  		return;
>>>>>  
>>>>> +	if (!getenv("ethaddr")) {
>>>>> +		if (getenv("usbethaddr")) {
>>>>> +			strcpy(mac, "usbethaddr");
>>>>> +		} else {
>>>>> +			debug("No ethernet MAC Address defined\n");
>>>>> +			return;
>>>>> +		}
>>>>> +	} else {
>>>>> +		strcpy(mac, "ethaddr");
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +
>>>>>  	i = 0;
>>>>> -	strcpy(mac, "ethaddr");
>>>>>  	while ((tmp = getenv(mac)) != NULL) {
>>>>>  		sprintf(enet, "ethernet%d", i);
>>>>>  		path = fdt_getprop(fdt, node, enet, NULL);
>>>> The problem is we may well have both.  I think we need to re-work the
>>>> function slightly to be:
>>>> while ((tmp = getenv(mac)) != NULL) {
>>>>   do_fdt_fixup_ethernet_x(tmp, fdt, node, enet, i)
>>>> }
>>>> if (getenv("usbethaddr"))
>>>>   do_fdt_fixup_ethernet_x("usbethaddr", fdt, ...)
>>>>
>>>> Where the name of the new function, and parameter order also makes sense
>>>> and is complete of course.  Thanks!
>>>>
>>> One issue with this approach is that we don't know which inteface in
>>> the dt is usb ethernet and which is not.  So correctly assigning the
>>> MAC to the correct inteface will be tricky.
>> Oh, that's true...  Maybe I should withdraw my objection, since we're
>> unlikely to really see both in production cases.
>>
>>> But the patch is flawed in the affect is that it does not take into
>>> account multiple usbethaddr either.  I will rework it for this but I
>>> am not sure about the other.
>> But we don't support that either, did a quick grep before posting.
>>
> Actually we do.  If you setenv eth1addr in the enviroment it will try to set it in the dtb for the next ethernet instance.
>
> The other option is to set the ethaddr and then have usbethaddr reference ethaddr and leave this code alone.
>
> Dan
>

Are there additional comments?
I currently do not have a V2 so I am assuming I have addressed all comments.

Please let me know.

Dan

-- 
------------------
Dan Murphy