From: Arvid Brodin <arvid.brodin@xdin.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Got u-boot-2012.10 running on at91rm9200 - but why does it work?
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:30:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5256C82A.2020708@xdin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52566484.4040008@bus-elektronik.de>
On 2013-10-10 10:25, Jens Scharsig wrote:
> Hello Arvid,
> Am 2013-10-09 21:23, schrieb Arvid Brodin:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I managed to get u-boot-2012.10 to boot from NOR flash on a custom
>> at91rm9200 board by doing this:
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvid Brodin <arvid.brodin@xdin.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/start.S | 8 +++-----
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/start.S
>> index 14c9156..efc4ea3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/start.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/start.S
>> @@ -294,9 +294,7 @@ clbss_e:
>> _nand_boot_ofs:
>> .word nand_boot
>> #else
>> - ldr r0, _board_init_r_ofs
>> - adr r1, _start
>> - add lr, r0, r1
>> + ldr lr, _board_init_r
>> add lr, lr, r9
>> /* setup parameters for board_init_r */
>> mov r0, r5 /* gd_t */
>> @@ -304,8 +302,8 @@ _nand_boot_ofs:
>> /* jump to it ... */
>> mov pc, lr
>>
>> -_board_init_r_ofs:
>> - .word board_init_r - _start
>> +_board_init_r:
>> + .word board_init_r
>> #endif
>>
>> _rel_dyn_start_ofs:
>>
>
> you don't need change start.s to boot from NOR.
> If shold set the #define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x00000000
But that's just the thing, I *do* need this change for the board to boot.
CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE is 0x10000000 (this is the base address for the flash
memory).
Without my patch above, I only get this:
----------
U-Boot 2012.10 (Oct 09 2013 - 02:28:44)
DRAM: 64 MiB
----------
I thought this was a known problem with at91rm9200 booting from NOR flash?
There's at least one other board that I know of with the same problem (the
Artila Matrix-500).
> Please see the configuration for eb_cpux9k2 board. This board does boot
> from NOR with u-boot 2012.10.
Hmm, you are right. This config does boot my card (after I modify it to suit,
of course). Besides the different CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE, I think the main
differences to the at91rm9200ek config that I based my earlier config on are
these things:
#define CONFIG_SYS_BOOT_SIZE 0x00 /* 0 KBytes */
#define CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_BASE PHYS_FLASH_1
#define CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_SIZE 0x60000 /* 384 KBytes */
None of these are declared in the at91rm9200ek config.
Unfortunately, I don't have an AT91RM9200EK card, so I can't test if the
problem I ran in to exists for that card as well using the at91rm9200ek
config.
--
Arvid Brodin | Consultant (Linux)
XDIN AB | Knarrarn?sgatan 7 | SE-164 40 Kista | Sweden | xdin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-10 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-09 19:23 [U-Boot] Got u-boot-2012.10 running on at91sam9200 - but why does it work? Arvid Brodin
2013-10-10 8:25 ` Jens Scharsig
2013-10-10 15:30 ` Arvid Brodin [this message]
2013-10-11 6:28 ` [U-Boot] Got u-boot-2012.10 running on at91rm9200 " Jens Scharsig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5256C82A.2020708@xdin.com \
--to=arvid.brodin@xdin.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox