From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: York Sun Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:38:53 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] powerpc/mpc85xx: Increase image size In-Reply-To: <1381955630.7979.741.camel@snotra.buserror.net> References: <52584386.7050104@freescale.com> <1381516790.7979.524.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <525849F0.60002@freescale.com> <525ECFD4.4080704@freescale.com> <1381952276.7979.737.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <525EF57A.2090105@freescale.com> <1381955392.7979.740.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <525EF7C1.9040908@freescale.com> <1381955630.7979.741.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Message-ID: <525EF95D.7010807@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 10/16/2013 01:33 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 13:32 -0700, York Sun wrote: >> On 10/16/2013 01:29 PM, Scott Wood wrote: >>> On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 13:22 -0700, York Sun wrote: >>>> On 10/16/2013 12:37 PM, Scott Wood wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 10:41 -0700, York Sun wrote: >>>>>> Are SPL and TPL boot methods immune from the size issue here? >>>>> >>>>> Sort of. We still need to fit inside existing partition tables. >>>>> >>>> >>>> PBL boot will be broken if the image size is bigger than 512KB, right? >>> >>> It has to be even smaller than that, to make room for early data. >>> >> >> So if we go with 768KB, do we have to convert all PBL boot to SPL boot? > > Only the targets that need the extra space. > We have T4, B4 and corenet_ds using PBL boot. They most likely will exceed the 512KB soon, if not yet. It maybe easier to change all of them togther, than one by one. York