From: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] ARM: U-boot and 2 GiB of ram with get_ram_size only being long
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 01:11:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5261C004.9010900@schinagl.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131018202659.28E95380627@gemini.denx.de>
On 10/18/13 22:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Scott Wood,
>
> In message <1382114601.7979.843.camel@snotra.buserror.net> you wrote:
>>
>> Did you see my other mail in this thread? This patch is sort of OK for
>> raising the get_ram_size() limit from 1 GiB to 2 GiB (with an increased
>> risk of false positives from I/O), but it can't go beyond that on
>> 32-bit. A better approach would be to get the RAM size from the memory
>> controller, which is what we do on many Freescale PPC boards.
>
> This is NOT a better approach. Reading the memory controller just
> tells you what is supposed to be there, i. e. what you programmed into
> the controller. get_ram_size() shows you what is _actually_ there,
> which may be a totally different thing, for example when different RAM
> chips can be fit on the board, or when the working area of the RAM is
> not the same as the actual chip size, for example due to hardware
> errors (shorts or interruptions on the address lines, etc.).
>
> get_ram_size() is a very efficient memory test that detects 95% or
> more of all RAM related hardware issues.
But is my patch acceptable and does it fix the phys_size_t = long vs
phys_size_t = unsigned long 'issue'. Does this patch fix that or make it
worse? And if so, how would that needed to be fixed.
Oliver
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-18 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-03 21:15 [U-Boot] [RFC] ARM: U-boot and 2 GiB of ram with get_ram_size only being long Oliver Schinagl
2013-10-07 2:41 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-10-15 7:12 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-10-15 17:57 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-17 6:27 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-10-18 0:04 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-10-18 16:43 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-18 20:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-10-18 21:04 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-18 21:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-10-18 23:11 ` Oliver Schinagl [this message]
2013-10-18 23:07 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-10-18 23:25 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-18 23:25 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-19 9:21 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-10-19 9:07 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-10-19 18:25 ` Tom Rini
2013-10-21 19:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-03-24 10:14 ` Olliver Schinagl
2013-10-15 18:01 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5261C004.9010900@schinagl.nl \
--to=oliver+list@schinagl.nl \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox