public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] ARM: U-boot and 2 GiB of ram with get_ram_size only being long
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 01:11:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5261C004.9010900@schinagl.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131018202659.28E95380627@gemini.denx.de>

On 10/18/13 22:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Scott Wood,
>
> In message <1382114601.7979.843.camel@snotra.buserror.net> you wrote:
>>
>> Did you see my other mail in this thread?  This patch is sort of OK for
>> raising the get_ram_size() limit from 1 GiB to 2 GiB (with an increased
>> risk of false positives from I/O), but it can't go beyond that on
>> 32-bit.  A better approach would be to get the RAM size from the memory
>> controller, which is what we do on many Freescale PPC boards.
>
> This is NOT a better approach.  Reading the memory controller just
> tells you what is supposed to be there, i. e. what you programmed into
> the controller.  get_ram_size() shows you what is _actually_ there,
> which may be a totally different thing, for example when different RAM
> chips can be fit on the board, or when the working area of the RAM is
> not the same as the actual chip size, for example due to hardware
> errors (shorts or interruptions on the address lines, etc.).
>
> get_ram_size() is a very efficient memory test that detects 95% or
> more of all RAM related hardware issues.
But is my patch acceptable and does it fix the phys_size_t = long vs 
phys_size_t = unsigned long 'issue'. Does this patch fix that or make it 
worse? And if so, how would that needed to be fixed.

Oliver
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-18 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-03 21:15 [U-Boot] [RFC] ARM: U-boot and 2 GiB of ram with get_ram_size only being long Oliver Schinagl
2013-10-07  2:41 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-10-15  7:12   ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-10-15 17:57     ` Scott Wood
2013-10-17  6:27       ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-10-18  0:04         ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-10-18 16:43           ` Scott Wood
2013-10-18 20:26             ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-10-18 21:04               ` Scott Wood
2013-10-18 21:53                 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-10-18 23:11               ` Oliver Schinagl [this message]
2013-10-18 23:07             ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-10-18 23:25               ` Scott Wood
2013-10-18 23:25                 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-19  9:21                   ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-10-19  9:07                 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-10-19 18:25                   ` Tom Rini
2013-10-21 19:44                 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-03-24 10:14                   ` Olliver Schinagl
2013-10-15 18:01 ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5261C004.9010900@schinagl.nl \
    --to=oliver+list@schinagl.nl \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox