[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] i2c, omap24xx: convert driver to new mutlibus/mutliadapter framework

[Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>]

On 10/28/13 08:19, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Igor,
> 
> Am 27.10.2013 08:30, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
>> Hi Heiko,
>>
>> On 10/22/13 11:03, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> - add omap24xx driver to new multibus/multiadpater support
>>> - adapted all config files, which uses this driver
>>>
>>> Tested on the am335x based siemens boards rut, dxr2 and pxm2
>>> posted here:
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/263211/
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher<hs@denx.de>
>>> Tested-by: Tom Rini<trini@ti.com>
>>> Cc: Lars Poeschel<poeschel@lemonage.de>
>>> Cc: Steve Sakoman<sakoman@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Thomas Weber<weber@corscience.de>
>>> Cc: Tom Rix<Tom.Rix@windriver.com>
>>> Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas<notasas@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra<eballetbo@iseebcn.com>
>>> Cc: Luca Ceresoli<luca.ceresoli@comelit.it>
>>> Cc: Igor Grinberg<grinberg@compulab.co.il>
>>> Cc: Ilya Yanok<yanok@emcraft.com>
>>> Cc: Stefano Babic<sbabic@denx.de>
>>> Cc: Nishanth Menon<nm@ti.com>
>>> Cc: Pali Roh?r<pali.rohar@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Peter Barada<peter.barada@logicpd.com>
>>> Cc: Nagendra T S<nagendra@mistralsolutions.com>
>>> Cc: Michael Jones<michael.jones@matrix-vision.de>
>>> Cc: Raphael Assenat<raph@8d.com>
>>
>> [...]
> [...]
> 
>>> diff --git a/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h b/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h
>>> index 02ffbb1..a07559d 100644
>>> --- a/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h
>>> +++ b/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h
>>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
>>>   #ifndef _EEPROM_
>>>   #define _EEPROM_
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_DRIVER_OMAP34XX_I2C
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_OMAP34XX
>>>   int cm_t3x_eeprom_read_mac_addr(uchar *buf);
>>>   u32 cm_t3x_eeprom_get_board_rev(void);
>>>   #else
>>
>> Please, rebase on top of:
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275284/
>> which should be applied any time soon.
>>
>> Otherwise,
>> Acked-by: Igor Grinberg<grinberg@compulab.co.il>
> 
> Hmm.. I cannot see, that your patch is accepted ... but I looked in it,
> and it looks good to me. So, I propose to add this patch to the i2c tree,
> so I do the necessary changes in my patch when applying it to the
> i2c tree (as they are trivial changes) ...

Well, I have no problem with that, but we need to take into account
that there are several more patches (unrelated to i2c) on the mailing
list waiting for approval/apply and depend on my series.

> 
> @Tom: Is this OK for you?

I think, it would be better to apply my series to u-boot-ti and you can
pull from it to the i2c tree?


-- 
Regards,
Igor.