From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Igor Grinberg Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:07:42 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] i2c, omap24xx: convert driver to new mutlibus/mutliadapter framework In-Reply-To: <526E01D5.5010103@denx.de> References: <1382432598-22547-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de> <526CC106.2030201@compulab.co.il> <526E01D5.5010103@denx.de> Message-ID: <526F96FE.4040006@compulab.co.il> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 10/28/13 08:19, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Igor, > > Am 27.10.2013 08:30, schrieb Igor Grinberg: >> Hi Heiko, >> >> On 10/22/13 11:03, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>> - add omap24xx driver to new multibus/multiadpater support >>> - adapted all config files, which uses this driver >>> >>> Tested on the am335x based siemens boards rut, dxr2 and pxm2 >>> posted here: >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/263211/ >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher >>> Tested-by: Tom Rini >>> Cc: Lars Poeschel >>> Cc: Steve Sakoman >>> Cc: Thomas Weber >>> Cc: Tom Rix >>> Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas >>> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra >>> Cc: Luca Ceresoli >>> Cc: Igor Grinberg >>> Cc: Ilya Yanok >>> Cc: Stefano Babic >>> Cc: Nishanth Menon >>> Cc: Pali Roh?r >>> Cc: Peter Barada >>> Cc: Nagendra T S >>> Cc: Michael Jones >>> Cc: Raphael Assenat >> >> [...] > [...] > >>> diff --git a/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h b/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h >>> index 02ffbb1..a07559d 100644 >>> --- a/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h >>> +++ b/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h >>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ >>> #ifndef _EEPROM_ >>> #define _EEPROM_ >>> >>> -#ifdef CONFIG_DRIVER_OMAP34XX_I2C >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_OMAP34XX >>> int cm_t3x_eeprom_read_mac_addr(uchar *buf); >>> u32 cm_t3x_eeprom_get_board_rev(void); >>> #else >> >> Please, rebase on top of: >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275284/ >> which should be applied any time soon. >> >> Otherwise, >> Acked-by: Igor Grinberg > > Hmm.. I cannot see, that your patch is accepted ... but I looked in it, > and it looks good to me. So, I propose to add this patch to the i2c tree, > so I do the necessary changes in my patch when applying it to the > i2c tree (as they are trivial changes) ... Well, I have no problem with that, but we need to take into account that there are several more patches (unrelated to i2c) on the mailing list waiting for approval/apply and depend on my series. > > @Tom: Is this OK for you? I think, it would be better to apply my series to u-boot-ti and you can pull from it to the i2c tree? -- Regards, Igor.