From: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 5/7] arm: atmel: add plla and mck initialize function
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:38:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5271B490.3010307@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5270EBD5.4010909@gmail.com>
Hi Andreas,
On 10/30/2013 19:21, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
> Hi Bo,
>
> On 10/30/2013 10:15 AM, Bo Shen wrote:
>> Add plla and mck initialize function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/at91/clock.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_common.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/at91/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/at91/clock.c
>> index 1588e0c..ec92950 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/at91/clock.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/at91/clock.c
>> @@ -120,3 +120,30 @@ void at91_periph_clk_enable(int id)
>> else
>> writel(1 << id, &pmc->pcer);
>> }
>> +
>> +void at91_plla_init(u32 pllar, int timeout)
>> +{
>> + struct at91_pmc *pmc = (struct at91_pmc *)ATMEL_BASE_PMC;
>> +
>> + writel(pllar, &pmc->pllar);
>> + while (!(readl(&pmc->sr) & (AT91_PMC_LOCKA | AT91_PMC_MCKRDY)))
>> + timeout--;
>
> I do not understand use of this timeout here ... You do not check it nor
> return something ... It would make sense to add an check into the wile()
> and return upon the state of timeout true/false.
> This however is not needed here cause we either succeed to setup the PLL
> or not. If not we could not proceed anyways, so why check it here?
OK, I will remove this timeout here.
> In connection with a watchdog it could make sense to kick it while
> waiting for PLL initialisation.
As watchdog is disabled, so can not use it.
>> +}
>> +
>> +void at91_mck_init(u32 mckr, int timeout)
>
> I wonder if it would make sense to abstract the functionality of mckr to
> the function parameters. Something like 'I want to set 400MHz, do it for
> me'. Maybe this doesn't make any sense, lets discuss.
As the SoC can run in 132MHz * (2, 3, 4), if it runs in different
frequency, the mckr configuration is different, so we need this function,
>> +{
>> + struct at91_pmc *pmc = (struct at91_pmc *)ATMEL_BASE_PMC;
>> + u32 tmp;
>> +
>> + tmp = readl(&pmc->mckr);
>> + tmp &= ~(AT91_PMC_MCKR_PRES_MASK |
>> + AT91_PMC_MCKR_MDIV_MASK |
>> + AT91_PMC_MCKR_PLLADIV_2);
>> + tmp |= mckr & (AT91_PMC_MCKR_PRES_MASK |
>> + AT91_PMC_MCKR_MDIV_MASK |
>> + AT91_PMC_MCKR_PLLADIV_2);
>> + writel(tmp, &pmc->mckr);
>> +
>> + while (!(readl(&pmc->sr) & AT91_PMC_MCKRDY))
>> + timeout--;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_common.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_common.h
>> index abcb97d..a692275 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_common.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_common.h
>> @@ -22,5 +22,7 @@ void at91_spi1_hw_init(unsigned long cs_mask);
>> void at91_udp_hw_init(void);
>> void at91_uhp_hw_init(void);
>> void at91_lcd_hw_init(void);
>> +void at91_plla_init(u32 pllar, int timeout);
>> +void at91_mck_init(u32 mckr, int timeout);
>>
>> #endif /* AT91_COMMON_H */
>>
>
Best Regards,
Bo Shen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-31 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-30 9:15 [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/7] arm: atmel: sama5d3: enable spl boot from SD card Bo Shen
2013-10-30 9:15 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/7] arm: atmel: sama5d3: early enable PIO peripherals Bo Shen
2013-10-30 10:12 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-10-30 11:11 ` Andreas Bießmann
2013-10-31 2:02 ` Bo Shen
2013-10-30 9:15 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/7] arm: atmel: sama5d3: correct the ID for DBGU and PIT Bo Shen
2013-10-30 11:12 ` Andreas Bießmann
2013-10-31 1:32 ` Bo Shen
2013-10-30 9:15 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/7] arm: atmel: the offset of MULA is 18 in sama5d3 Bo Shen
2013-10-30 9:15 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 4/7] arm: atmel: sama5: correct the error define of DIV Bo Shen
2013-10-30 9:15 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 5/7] arm: atmel: add plla and mck initialize function Bo Shen
2013-10-30 11:21 ` Andreas Bießmann
2013-10-31 1:38 ` Bo Shen [this message]
2013-10-30 9:15 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 6/7] arm: atmel: add ddr2 initialization function Bo Shen
2013-10-30 9:15 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 7/7] spl: mmc: FAT support boot u-boot Bo Shen
2013-10-30 10:15 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-10-30 10:43 ` Andreas Bießmann
2013-10-30 10:57 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-10-30 11:02 ` Andreas Bießmann
2013-10-31 1:30 ` Bo Shen
2013-10-31 7:42 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-10-31 7:50 ` Bo Shen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5271B490.3010307@atmel.com \
--to=voice.shen@atmel.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox